A Neocolonial Critique of Contemplative Practices

I do not feel that the contemplative practices in this class result in cognitive, emotional, and somatic self-awareness. I think taking a moment to rest in class is beneficial for the anti-capitalist refusal of grind-culture in academics, but not much beyond giving our eyes a much-needed break from sensory stimuli. 

Contemplative and mindfulness practices are often misinterpreted to be universal in essence. As Maria Ishikawa argues in her article, “Mindfulness in Western Contexts Perpetuates Oppressive Realities for Minority Cultures: The Consequences of Cultural Appropriation”, “knowledge appropriation, in the case of mindfulness practices of North American societies, fails to recognize the original and specific cultural purposes of mindfulness.” Beyond this, I think that a bare-bones acknowledgement of Buddhism, does not equate true recognition of the ways in which knowledge appropriation treats culturally-specific knowledge as terra nullius, or land without ownership and therefore available to be claimed and taken. 

Terra nullius can be extended to culturally specific practices. Knowledge that does not fall into western conceptualizations of productive or scientifically-sound reasoning is inherently invaluable, until western, or dominant forms of knowledge, add value to it through ‘modernization’, secularization, and other forms of cultural extraction and abstraction. As Ishikawa writes, “individualized mindfulness practices as appropriated by the dominant cultures of North America is a manifestation of knowledge as terra nullius because these practices are not presented as ‘of value’ in their original collectivist and holistic purpose”. Cultural concepts of who we are in connection to the surrounding world, like Daoist practices, are abstracted and appropriated to their symbols (yin-yang), which are capitalized upon and used for t-shirt logos and computer avatars. ‘Mindfulness’ is not an individualistic, momentary, or a periodic practice, as misinterpreted by the west. I disagree with the assumption that we can ‘become present’ and practice contemplative practices to fulfill some sort of purpose or outcome. As Suzuki Shunryu wrote in his book Zen Mind, “These forms are not a means of obtaining the right state of mind […] when you try to attain something, your mind starts to wander about somewhere else. When you do not try to attain anything, you have your own body and mind right here.”



Death is what makes life great

What role does the denial of death have in the Anthropocene?
Humans are currently a driving force of ecological disasters. We are ruining the ecosystem, killing off species, and destroying the ozone layer, which will kill all human life if nothing changes. What can we do to change this?
I think a part of the problem is dominant modern culture ignores death. Maybe this could be because most people don’t think about their deaths. Worm in the Core quotes Michel de Montaigne’s famous essay That to study Philosophy Is to Learn to Die,

—let us learn bravely to stand our ground, and fight him. And to begin to deprive him of the greatest advantage he has over us, let us take a way quite contrary to the common course. Let us disarm him of his novelty and strangeness, let us converse and be familiar with him, and have nothing so frequent in our thoughts as death. Upon all occasions represent him to our imagination in his every shape; at the stumbling of a horse, at the falling of a tile, at the least prick with a pin, let us presently consider, and say to ourselves, “Well, and what if it had been death itself?” and, thereupon, let us encourage and fortify ourselves. Let us evermore, amidst our jollity and feasting, set the remembrance of our frail condition before our eyes, never suffering ourselves to be so far transported with our delights, but that we have some intervals of reflecting upon, and considering how many several ways this jollity of ours tends to death, and with how many dangers it threatens it.

The book points out effective terror management should constitute being comfortable with one’s death. We should normalize talking about death so we can take a deeper appreciation of life, with more empathy towards living things around us. By being comfortable and reflecting on our own inevitable deaths, we can appreciate life’s beauty. This means being conscious of our actions and how they affect others and the planet.
I propose to whoever is reading this to think about death, not morbidly but about your death, and how that affects your actions, thoughts, and world views. Thinking about what you think can help you reflect on how to live a more decisive and aware life. Hopefully, you can be more self-conscious about your actions, evaluate whether you are spending your time the way you want to, and how you have affected those around you.
Anthropocene Syndrome: a complex of environmental degradation,... | Download Scientific Diagram