UW Film Club Podcast #99: Mandy

“Your podcast exudes a cosmic darkness… do you see that?”

In this special extended-length episode, our host is joined by two Nicolas Cage scholars to discuss the legendary actor’s magnum opus — Panos Cosmatos’ 2018 psychedelic action-horror film, Mandy! We discuss the film’s themes of grief, revenge, drug use, masculine aggression and more– while gushing over Benjamin Loeb’s gorgeous digital cinematography, and Cosmatos’ rip-roaring action sequences. In the end, we also get to talk about how Mandy has influenced these two young filmmakers in their own budding ventures as actors/directors. Strap in — it’s a wild ride!

ON THIS EPISODE: Harrison Hall, Sam Neer, Rowan Tull

You can find us on Facebook at /UWFilmClub, and on Twitter and Instagram @FilmClubUW. Make sure to rate, comment, and subscribe to our podcast on Apple Podcasts, Soundcloud, Spotify, and Google Play, and tune in every week for a new episode of the UW Film Club Podcast!

Retrospective: ‘Annihilation’ is an Underrated Horror Gem That Got Lost in the Streaming Shuffle

We all have comfort movies, things we like to pop on whenever we’re feeling down and just need to escape for one to two hours. Annihilation is mine. This may seem like a weird choice at first—and to a certain extent it is—but I stand by it. Annihilation is a 2018 film directed by Alex Garland based on a novel of the same name by Jeff VanderMeer, from his Southern Reach trilogy. Continue reading “Retrospective: ‘Annihilation’ is an Underrated Horror Gem That Got Lost in the Streaming Shuffle”

UW Film Club Podcast #57 – Blindspotting

“When you record that podcast episode, just don’t tell me about it. Plausible deniability.”

This week on the podcast, podcast host Jim Saunders is joined by special guest Thomas Lin to talk about the feature length narrative debut from director Carlos Lopez Estrada, “Blindspotting”! Evocative, honest, and multifaceted in its portrayal of gentrification and racial identity in America, it’s easily one of the most important films of 2018. In this episode, we discuss the social issues presented throughout the film, its uncanny blend of comedy and drama, and how its 95 minute runtime makes its themes succinct and pack a real emotional weight. See the film for yourself, then check out the 57th episode of the UW Film Club Podcast!

You can find us on Facebook at /UWFilmClub, and on Twitter and Instagram @FilmClubUW. Make sure to rate, comment, and subscribe to our podcast on Apple Podcasts, Soundcloud, Spotify, and Google Play, and tune in every Monday for a new episode of the UW Film Club Podcast!

Review: Peter Jackson Makes The Old New With ‘They Shall Not Grow Old’

Peter Jackson’s latest project and newest display of his technical prowess is not what the commoner would expect. The director of The Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit trilogies is not helming a big budget blockbuster or even a traditional narrative film. Rather, he’s going smaller: a restoration documentary about the soldiers of WWI. They Shall Not Grow Old is the result of four years of work by Jackson and crew. What was originally supposed to be a commissioned work for the Imperial War Museums  is now getting a wide release after sold out Fathom events. Unlike other documentaries, the film positions it self as an achievement of archival work as it takes decades old footage and revitalizes it, giving it an entirely new and modern look thanks to new technological advancements. 

In fact, the biggest selling point of the film is the restoration itself. Jackson, a man of technological development and implementation (both good and bad), collected troves of archival footage, and after playing with it for three months, turned the compilation into a full blow redux. The old film stock goes through your classic restoration — cleaned, 4k scanned, digitized —, but more strikingly is how the team used advancements in technology to breath new life into the film. The before and after of the restoration is remarkable, and it should be seen as a new touch stone for restoration. It’s so good that one would hope the same process could be applied to other archives so that they too may see the benefits exhibited here.

However, there is also an aspect of manipulation. The idea of restoration is to bring film back to its original state and make it as close to the original version that was captured, but here Jackson is adding elements. The film is now colorized, the motion has been smoothed to look more natural, and the subjects have been given voice over performances. It goes beyond the usual methods of restoration, and whether or not that conflicts with the principle of historical accuracy, I have to say, it’s nothing short of impressive. I’d imagine there are multiple layers and iterations of the restoration on hard drives with varying degrees of manipulation, so I can’t get too upset at the fact Jackson had creative inputs on this particular project. Somewhere there is a version that does restoration in the traditional sense, we just haven’t seen it.

They Shall Not Grow Old distances itself from historical details in order to tell the story of the men who were apart of the battle. The film doesn’t specify specific battles, locations, or dates, but rather, it deals in personal testimonies. Pulling from over 600 hours of oral history, the film strings together first hand accounts of soldiers who experienced the war. There is a sense of collective grouping that comes with this narration; Jackson sequences individual sentences from multiple individuals and overlays them with the restored footage. There are no monologs or extended narration by any one individual, and the faces of the speaking veterans are never even shown. The result is a sense that the soldiers are a singular body that experienced the war together. This is not about a particular unit or company, but rather the collective ‘they’ that the title suggests, the entire mass of soldiers that served. By the end of the film, you come to an understanding about the human aspects of war and the impacts it has on people, something often lost in the discussion of it all.

The film evokes anthropological notions of why humankind goes to war and the repercussions it has on those fighting. It’s a theme that has been addressed several times before, but made fresh with the restoration, more importantly, the structural approach Jackson takes makes the war more human than historical. 

3.75/5 Stars

Review: I’d Rule in Favor of ‘On the Basis of Sex’

From director Mimi Ledger comes the riveting story of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. This biopic, starring Felicity Jones and Armie Hammer, tells the story of Ginsburg’s struggles, battles, and victories against sexism in and out of the courtroom. Despite the somewhat cookie-cutter script, both Jones and Hammer give exceptional performances that live up to the lives of their characters. The film also stars Justin Theroux, Kathy Bates, Sam Waterston, and Cailee Spaeny.

Continue reading “Review: I’d Rule in Favor of ‘On the Basis of Sex’”

Review: The Interactivity of ‘Bandersnatch’ Isn’t The Future, But It Sure Is Futuristic

On December 28th, Netflix released a special one-off episode of their original series Black Mirror. The series, which only became a Netflix Original in its third season, is an anthology of standalone episodes, each of which explores a different aspect of the human condition through a science fiction or technological lens. However, this installment, a movie named Bandersnatch, is a different beast altogether. It is the series’ first attempt at interactive storytelling.

Image result for bandersnatch

The user-controlled system, recently integrated into Netflix’s platform, is a new and intriguing form of entertainment. Of course, media in which the audience chooses their own path is nothing new in and of itself. Bandersnatch even discusses choose-your-own-adventure novels within the film and the near-defunct game studio Telltale Games has been bringing this concept to video games for years now. But until now, there hasn’t been such a high-budget and well-produced piece of live-action content that has implemented this idea.

If one is to discuss Bandersnatch viewing it only as a linear story, there is still a lot of good to be said about it. The performances, especially by its lead, Fionn Whitehead, and supporting actor Will Poulter, are wonderful, and the writing is clever and thoroughly engaging. It delves pretty deeply into the theme of free will and remains focused on this idea throughout. But despite all these good things, it’s clear you can’t analyze Bandersnatch simply linearly. Its story is living and breathing, and most aren’t going to experience it in the same way as one another. For this reason, you can’t critique its plot exactly or compare it to other TV episodes or features in a straightforward way.

Despite this, I still think that as an overall experience Bandersnatch is one of the best Black Mirror episodes that has ever been released. The mutability of its plot feeds directly into its thematic content and provides for a viewing experience that’s not only unique but fascinatingly rich and complex. Having control over the plot is not just novel it’s very enjoyable and, at least in my experience, makes you more empathetic to the main character. For instance, early on I made decisions simply because I wanted to see what would happen. But, as the story progressed I found myself wanting to keep the protagonist, Stefan Butler, safe and made choices that would keep him out of harm’s way. Of course, this isn’t always possible, but at the very least I found that Bandersnatch let me connect to the characters of Black Mirror far more significantly than I ever have before.

Of course, this doesn’t mean that everything we watch going forward needs to be interactive. This kind of storytelling is a very fun experience but it certainly wouldn’t suit any story like it does Bandersnatch. In a lot of cases, giving the audience agency might actually make the narrative a lot less compelling. However, while this form of entertainment may not be the future, I do hope that more efforts are made to incorporate this concept into projects going forward. If they are, Bandersnatch will surely be the standard by which all endeavors into this art form are measured up against.

Score: You Choose!/5

 

Review: Your Five-Year-Old Will Love ‘Bumblebee’

For the last eleven years, the Transformer franchise has been under the helm of action director Michael Bay. The 2007 original was a fun time to be had, but since then, we’ve received four sequels with each subsequent entry seemingly getting worse and worse. But now, Travis Knight is taking a stab at the franchise’s first spin-off: Bumblebee. Of Kubo and the Two Strings fame, Knight is making his first live-action film debut with a franchise that has long needed new blood in the mix to reinvigorate itself. The result is a film that is the best since the original, but also not the most impressive standalone film, resulting in a baseline coming-of-age tale that just so happens to feature everyone’s favorite transforming cars.

Set in 1987 before the other films in the series, Bumblebee tracks Charlie (Hailee Steinfeld) as she navigates high school in the wake of losing her dad. While the rest of her family has moved on, she still lingers on what use to be. On her eighteenth birthday, she finds a beaten-up Volkswagen Beatle, who, as you know, ends up being our titular Autobot, Bumblebee (a.k.a. “Bee”). Upon discovery, the two form an unlikely friendship, but it is threatened when Decepticons come to Earth in search of Bee.

Genre-wise, the film is a coming-of-age film akin to what you would find in the 80s. It’s got the look, the character archetypes, and of course, the 80s music soundtrack to make the film feel like a grandchild of the John Hughes era — even making the iconic ending pose from The Breakfast Club a point of cultural connection for Bee. Charlie’s whole character has sprinkles of Andie from Pretty in Pink as her outcast status in high school makes her find solace in a friendship with Bee, and there are loads of callbacks, name drops, and easter eggs to find hidden away in the film to give hints of nostalgia if you’re into that. The film is inspired by the 80s and it’s not afraid to show it.

Narratively, if you’ve seen Iron Giant, you’ve seen this film. Distilling the plot to its essence will result in the same movie, and while that doesn’t necessarily make the film bad in its own right, it’s how the film tries to reiterate itself where it falls short. In my viewing, I couldn’t find the ‘it’ factor where the film diverges from its inspiration. For the most part, it plays it safe, hitting the plot points the film needs to in order for the dramatic narrative function, but it never goes beyond that.

Central to the film is the relationship between Charlie and Bumblebee. Their bond is like that of Hogarth and the Iron Giant in the sense that they are opposed at first, but come to understand one another as the story progresses. It is the heart of the film, but again, it only facilitates minimal thematic function and never goes the extra mile to stake its claim. The whole experience is almost passive. You engage with a few moments and perk up when the action unfolds, but for the most part, you’re left on autopilot. It runs the gamut, it checks all the boxes, but it doesn’t quite go that extra mile.

It’s a shame because Travis Knight presented some promise for the series. Post Kubo, there was hope that a new director in the mix could rejuvenate the long stale franchise, but in the end, we only got something that was passable. It’s much, much better than the middle entries and leagues better than last year’s The Last Knight, but with respect to movies as a whole, it’s just alright.

Bumblebee is a film that your five-year-old will love. It’ll teach them how a narrative works, what it means to be a friend, and they’ll get to see some explosions along the way. But if you’re looking for something deeper, you’ll come up short.

Score: 2.75/5

Review: ‘Mary Poppins Returns’ Needs a Few More Spoonfuls of Sugar

Children, grab your pitchforks: the adults are jaded again! Or at least that’s what Disney wants you to believe with its second live-action film of the year featuring the same recurring theme. Unlike Christopher Robin, Mary Poppins Returns has more to live up to seeing as it’s the sequel to one of the most beloved films of all time. Also unlike Christopher Robin (or the original Mary Poppins for that matter), Mary Poppins Returns falls short of being anything memorable.

Continue reading “Review: ‘Mary Poppins Returns’ Needs a Few More Spoonfuls of Sugar”

Review: ‘Vice’ is a Glorified Wikipedia Page

At first, Vice predicates itself on an intriguing concept: create a funny and darkly satirical biopic based on one of the world’s nastiest and most powerful men. It begs the question: “How does one make Dick Cheney — one of the most humorless men in America — actually humorous?” Director and screenwriter Adam McKay, who has tackled difficult subjects with a satirical tone before, seemed perfect for the job. However, instead of the biting script, perfectly timed comedic moments, and clear tone we have come to expect from McKay in the wake of The Big Short, Vice is merely a glorified, surface-level Wikipedia page.

Continue reading “Review: ‘Vice’ is a Glorified Wikipedia Page”

Review: ‘If Beale Street Could Talk’ is a Beautiful Adaptation of James Baldwin’s Masterpiece

If there was one takeaway from 2016’s Moonlight, the indie underdog that upset at the Oscars, it’s that writer/director Barry Jenkins is a rising talent in the industry. Only his second feature film, Moonlight established him as a talented filmmaker with a unique voice and an eye for the cinematic. If Beale Street Could Talk, an adaptation of the James Baldwin novel of the same name, is a film that certainly continues that reputation.

From a presentation standpoint, the film is undeniably one of the most beautiful films of 2018. Every shot feels so thoughtfully constructed; its maturity and grace parallels the weighty themes of the source material in an incredibly respectful and nuanced way. Each frame is a painting, and the direction, in all aspects, is meticulously crafted with a precision only seen in films by true masters of cinema. The camera has such a natural, almost dream-like movement to it that absorbs you into the world of the film. Shot in the Univisium 2.00:1 aspect ratio, it also provides a unique look only shared by 3 other major films this year.  James Laxton, who was also the director of photography on Moonlight, is bound for another Oscar nomination and definitely a potential win. The score, arranged by Nicholas Britell, is gorgeous as well, providing a jazzy, low-key and subdued ambiance that somehow manages to overwhelm the audience in its beauty. The score, whenever present, permeates the film with its allure and grace.

The film’s best scene, however, is absent of any music, but of course is still a feast to the eyes: a long-take scene shared between Fonny (Stephan James) and Daniel (Brian Tyree Henry), with them simply chatting around a table in Fonny’s apartment, shot beautifully with close-ups through the haze of cigarette smoke. Henry, one of the breakout stars of 2018, appears in an extended cameo and delivers an incredibly powerful performance worthy of Best Supporting Actor. Even with the dream-like nature of the cinematography, the conversation and the subject matter of both the scene and the film seem painfully real and honest. It occurs chronologically before Fonny is falsely imprisoned for rape, and just 3 months after Daniel had been released from prison. Daniel is initially presented to the audience as a comedic, charming presence, but later on, in the same scene, he reveals to Fonny the brutal and terrifying world of the prison system and how it has shaped him. The camera holds on Daniel’s face and we witness his scared eyes underneath his hardened exterior. The performance is truly something special, and this entire scene is one of the most devastatingly real moments in film in 2018. And the movie is filled with powerful scenes such as this one.

Another powerful scene occurs when Tish (Kiki Layne) describes, in the form of narration, her experience working as a black woman in the perfume department of an expensive retail store in the early 1970s. She takes the job in an attempt to make enough money to bail Fonny, her fiance, out of jail, while also being pregnant with his child. Much of the dramatic and emotional tension of the film comes from whether or not Tish, along with her mother, Sharon (played expertly by Regina King), can prove Fonny’s innocence, making the financial struggles of Kiki and her family even direr. The crux of the scene in the store involves a “black cat” metaphor that she uses, which very intelligently sums up the themes of institutional racism, yet also highlights and celebrates the distance one will go for love, making the film so much more than just an ordinary romance.

If Beale Street Could Talk is a gorgeous film that shares the power of love and hope in the face of adversity. It speaks to the generations of black men torn from their families due to the institutional discrimination that continues to be perpetuated. It’s an important film that demands to be seen, a timeless story that will both resonate and devastate. There’s so much more to say about the film, but the main takeaway is this: it’s easily one of the best films of 2018, and Barry Jenkins has still got it.

Score: 5/5