Review: The Big, Loud, Stupid Movie that is Pacific Rim Uprising

After Crimson Peak, Guillermo del Toro was on to direct the sequel to his 2013 surprise hit Pacific Rim: an action sci-fi film that borrowed from both Kaiju and Mech films and blended them into one. The original was pulpy, but in the sea of comic book movies that were just starting to hit their stride that summer, it stood out as a carefully crafted blockbuster that knew what it was while maintaining a degree of nuance that prevented it from devolving into another Transformer film. However, in 2015 Legendary Pictures was sold to Wanda Group, forcing delays and causing del Toro to leave the sequel for a little picture called The Shape of Water instead. The artistry and enthusiasm that del Toro brought to the table was lost and the fate of the film given to Steven S. DeKnight.

And here in lies the problem with Pacific Rim Uprising: it forgets what it is and what inspired it. Del Toro is passionate about the creature feature, and it showed on the screen. This film is nothing more than a shell of its former self. This is simply a big, loud, stupid movie that goes all in on the blockbuster tendencies that make the Transformer franchise so insufferable while ditching the subtleties that came from a caring creator and its influences.

Cailee Spaeny as Amara Namani and John Boyega playing Jake Pentecost.

For the last ten years, humanity has been free from the Kaiju threat. As cities rebuild, scrappers scour the destroyed remnants of cities for old jaeger parts to either sell or repurpose for their own fighting machines. Enter Jake Pentecost (a Jaeger Ranger exile who is the son of the first film’s hero Stacker Pentecost) and Amara Namani (a talented young pilot who crafts her own robots after losing her family to Kaiju). When the two get caught stealing, they are thrown into the Jaeger Pilot Academy as redemption. From there, the two rogues engage in head butting antics with more in-line cadets until a new danger emerges: Rogue Jaegers. With looming peril, the two must harness their skills and put conflicts aside with other cadets in order to ready a new generation of pilots to defend Earth from its biggest threats.

The problem is how nothing outside of the fights matters at all, making the film one big drawl. There are interesting elements injected into the film, such as talk of drone use, a globalized defense force, and residual fallout from the initial Kaiju attack, but they are never leveraged into something meaningful or thematically relevant. Instead, the audience merely waves past them as they barrel toward a baffling central narrative that’ll have you scratching your head with its erratic nature and an emotionless subplot that follows Pentecost and Namani both trying to live up to expectations set upon them (which doesn’t work because either: A) they never get enough time to come to fruition, or B) the interactions given to the characters are dull and meaningless).

When in motion, all scale is lost.

And that isn’t to say that the action is good either. The film predicates itself on selling big monster fights, but it doesn’t even seem to do that right either because by the third act it felt as if I was watching a bunch of toys clanging together. The spectacle generated from seeing massive mechs take on Kaiju is all but lost in the sequel, and its blandness makes for a boring viewing experience. This is destruction porn at its finest and I was astounded by how much it mirrors the Transformers franchise in terms of haphazard construction and repugnant styling.

The tipping point is when the film decides to insert the Trololol song, and I couldn’t tell if it was mocking itself for how bombastically insane it was, or laughing at the audience for actually seeing this movie. Regardless of its intent, at that point in the film I didn’t really care how the rest of the story panned out because I just wanted to go home.

Score: 1.5/5

Review: Going Full Cliche with The Strangers Prey At Night

In 2008, the original The Strangers brought a tense cat and mouse game to the big screen with its home invasion. Part horror film and part thriller, the story depicted three masked psychopaths tormenting a couple in their isolated home over the course of one night. What made the film so great was how it generated eerily effective scares using hollow killers that derived sadistic satisfaction from ultra violence. It made you feel as the random selection that occurred to the couple in the film could happen to you, making you think twice about answering your own door and check your surroundings when things got too quiet. It didn’t garner positive reviews upon release, but since then it has gained champions (including yours truly) in the form of a cult following.

Ten years later, The Strangers Prey at Night drops and it’s accompanied by a new coat of paint. With the exception of the three lunatics and a few details, the film is essentially a sequel in name only as it breaks with its predecessor and revives itself as an 80’s slasher film. The problem is the film leans too far into these nostalgic elements, and goes well into realm of cliche, forgetting any and all semblance of what made the original so great.

The film follows a family of four (strong-willed dad Mike, perky mom Cindy, jock son Luke, and rebellious daughter Kinsey) as they go on a small vacation before Kinsey is sent away to boarding school. The location of their trip is a secluded trailer park owned by their relatives, but shortly after finding them dead, things start getting weird as three masked individuals torment and try to kill the family.

If that synopsis sounds familiar it’s because it is. You’ve seen this exact same movie play out a hundred times in other movies, and the film does little in the way of differentiating itself. The film is not ashamed of its inspirations as it proudly wears them on it’s sleeve, but the film is riddled with horror cliches that make the movie head scratching to say the least. Shapeless characters splitting up only to be picked off one by one. Check. Loud jump scares that mask the lack of real scares. Check. Dropping your weapon for no reason and leaving your phones behind. Double check. There are dozens of cliched moments throughout the film that will be readily apparent as you frustratingly clench your fist and passively think, “Why the hell are they doing that?!” The film really tries to be an 80s slasher film, but the elements never amount to anything worthy of your time, especially when considering how unique the original film’s proposition and resolve was.

The only moment I can say really worked was a pool sequence set to Bonnie Tyler’s ‘Total Eclipse of the Heart’ which not only had a great esthetic to it, but was also rather well directed in terms of its sequencing. It’s the one shinning moment in the film, but other than that, I’d be hard pressed to find something that this film did better than its influences. The majority of the 80’s synth needle drops don’t work. There are WAY too many push in shots. And half the time you’ll be shaking your head at what the characters are doing on screen. It’s simply a bastardization of The Stranger’s name.

The Strangers Prey at Night is a watchable flick, but it is not all that great. As it tries to pay tribute to the horror films that inspired it, it goes too far with its tropes and cliches which ultimately collapse in on themselves.  The film lives well within the shadow of the original and is nothing less then a disappointing sequel.

Score: 2.25/5

Review: Love, Simon and the Profound Power of Being Yourself

I’ll admit, I was a little nervous when I found out Becky Albertalli’s Simon vs The Homo Sapiens Agenda was being adapted into a movie. The book is charming and feels very genuine, and it’s always possible for qualities like that to get lost in translation. But I was immediately charmed by Nick Robinson as Simon Spier, and ultimately charmed by Love, Simon itself.

The film, distributed by 20th Century Fox, certainly didn’t escape without any big-studio gloss. For example, everyone seems to be obscenely rich–when Abby (Alexandra Shipp) first came out of her house I thought it was the school. At times, too, the movie feels overly choreographed and a little stiff, especially during the first fifteen minutes or so. Soon, however, the movie shakes off these Hollywood trappings and settles into a genuine, funny, moving storyline with engaging characters.

Related image

Love, Simon, directed by Greg Berlanti, follows Simon Spier, who has a “totally normal” life except for one big secret: nobody knows he’s gay. He strikes up an email correspondence with an anonymous closeted gay kid from his school, and everything just kind of snowballs from there. The movie is about Simon coming to terms with coming out, and tells this story, a very rare one in Hollywood, in a way that feels authentic and true.

The movie gets a lot right about what it’s like to be a teen today. Simon’s bedroom walls are decorated with exactly the sort of paraphernalia you might find in my bedroom back home–photos and pins and Hogwarts gear (he’s a Hufflepuff) and even a Hamilton playbill. The scenes where Simon and his friends are in the car listening to the radio reminded me powerfully of high school, as did the high schoolers themselves. For the most part, their friendships feel earned and earnest rather than written.

As much as it gets right about being a teenager, the movie hits an absolute home run in portraying what it’s like to be queer in a world that assumes you’re straight. Scenes where someone thinks Simon likes girls or makes a joke about being gay hit particularly hard. And the way the movie treats his coming outs is incredibly well done; even the fact that they’re a plurality drives this home (because really, you never stop coming out). The reactions from Simon’s friends, teachers, parents, and peers are all different–sometimes casual, sometimes heartfelt or heartbreaking, occasionally cruel–but all of them feel true. These scenes, I think, will speak the most to the people who deserve them the most: young queer people like Simon.

Image result for love, simon

Love, Simon is certainly not a perfect movie.  And yes, it’s a funny, sweet, heartfelt film, but I don’t think it will win Oscars or become an instant classic. However, I feel that what matters most about this movie is not how it is: it’s what it means. Films are not just the sum of their parts; they are culture and representation and acceptance. They are signposts for what is desirable, expected, and accepted.

At the screening I attended, there was a huge banner where the kids seeing the movie wrote messages to the cast. I saw dozens of notes from LGBTQ+ kids who were just so happy there was finally a coming of age movie about them. They said they felt excited and proud. This movie treats being gay and coming out not as a spectacle or a curse, but as a normal part of growing up. Its big studio gloss might even serve to emphasize the essential message: being gay is absolutely normal, and simply being proud to be yourself is the bravest thing you can do.

Score: 3.5/5 stars

Make sure to check out our interview with the stars of Love, Simon, Nick Robinson and Alexandra Shipp!

Review: A Surprisingly Fun Time with Game Night

In the shadow of Black Panther, Game Night has a tall task of luring audiences into its theater this weekend. After a initial trailer that left a lot to be desired, it would be easy to write this film off as another February comedy dumped in the early months of the year to clear space on Warner Bro’s shelf, but I have to admit, Game Night is one of the most pleasant surprises I’ve had in a long time. There is nothing spectacular in terms of thematic development, but come on, it’s a comedy. It’s more important that the film generates a few good laughs and this movie does them surprisingly well.

The film follows Max (Jason Bateman) and Annie (Racheal McAdams), a competitive couple who hosts weekly game nights at their home. One week Max’s brother Brooks (Kyle Chandler) suddenly comes to town and hosts a game night of his own that promises thrills and excitement via a simulated kidnapping. But things go awry when their role playing game gets mixed in with Brooks’s real kidnapping, causing the group to spend the night enduring hijinks and antics in order to get Max’s brother back.

Jesse Plemons (Meth Damon) playing Gary with his dog Bastion

Everyone lends their comedic talents equally, but Jesse Plemon’s character steals the show. He is hands down, bar-none the best part of this film. He plays a stoic yet creepy neighbor who wants to participate in the game nights, but is left out because of his awkwardness, lack of skill, and his recently divorced status from a close friend of Max and Annie’s. Every scene Plemons is in is hilarious, striking the right balance between a sincere human being and a total psychopath. Most of the jokes stem from his inability to move on from his divorced wife, and when combined with his eerie nature and exclusion, you get a winning formula for some sadistic humor. His role is worth the watch alone (it’s that good), plus the credit sequence adds a nice touch to his character.

The jokes in the film are actually quite good and you’ll give a hearty laugh from time to time. The narrative sometimes feels like an empty vehicle to get to the next joke, but if I have to be frank, the audience isn’t here for the story, it’s here for the comedy. There are a few instances where the scene is structured around an overall punchline (namely a scene that involve’s Gary being distracted by the group while Max tries to access his computer), but it’s mostly just one liners, pop culture references, and physical humor that is overlaid on to sequential events to move the story along (and for the most part that’s ok). The plot is straightforward and the premise works well enough to keep you engaged throughout the run time of the film, and it functions so much better than I would of ever given it credit for which is a pleasant surprise.

Game Night is not a mind blowing film, but is certainly a fun film with a solid narrative and stand out comedic performances. It manages to shake the stigmas so many bad comedies have while retaining the elements that make films within the genre so enjoyable. They say you shouldn’t judge a book by its cover, and in this instance, it couldn’t be more true.

Score: 3.25/5 Stars