Review: ‘Rebecca’ Adaptation Pales in Comparison to Hitchcock’s Original

Just in time for Halloween, Netflix has released Rebecca, the third adaptation of Daphne du Maurier’s beloved 1938 novel about the sinister ongoings at an English country estate. The 1940 Alfred Hitchcock adaptation, winner of the Academy Award for Best Picture and starring Laurence Olivier and Joan Fontaine, is often considered to be the best version of the story. Ben Wheatley’s rote adaptation of Rebecca only goes to proves the superiority and timelessness of Hitchcock’s. Continue reading “Review: ‘Rebecca’ Adaptation Pales in Comparison to Hitchcock’s Original”

UW Film Club Podcast #32 – The Social Network

“You don’t get to 500 million friends without making a few podcasts.”

For our 32nd episode, we’re bringing on former club presidents Jamie Housen and Kevin Conner to talk about one of their personal all time favorites: David Fincher’s The Social Network! In this cyber-packed episode, we talk about the film’s lasting legacy, what thematic elements drive the narrative, and how the film manages to perform on every level to make it one of the best films in the last ten years. Drop the ‘the,’ and don’t get left behind with the newest episode of the UW Film Club Podcast!

On this week’s episode: Kevin Conner, Jamie Housen, Cynthia Li, and Greg Arietta.

You can find us on Facebook at /UWFilmClub, and on Twitter and Instagram @FilmClubUW.  Make sure to rate, comment, and subscribe to our podcast on Apple Podcasts,  Soundcloud, Spotify, and Google Play, and tune in every Monday for a new episode of the UW Film Club Podcast!

Review: I’d Rule in Favor of ‘On the Basis of Sex’

From director Mimi Ledger comes the riveting story of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. This biopic, starring Felicity Jones and Armie Hammer, tells the story of Ginsburg’s struggles, battles, and victories against sexism in and out of the courtroom. Despite the somewhat cookie-cutter script, both Jones and Hammer give exceptional performances that live up to the lives of their characters. The film also stars Justin Theroux, Kathy Bates, Sam Waterston, and Cailee Spaeny.

Continue reading “Review: I’d Rule in Favor of ‘On the Basis of Sex’”

Review: The Crazy Social Comedy That Is Sorry to Bother You

This film was screened at the 44th Seattle International Film Festival. The film is now in wide release in Seattle.

As our society seemingly becomes crazier and crazier, it takes an even crazier film to encapsulate it all. Stepping up to the plate to do just that is Boots Riley’s Sorry to Bother You. Hailing from the music industry, Riley is making his feature debut with a comedy that wants to put a mirror up to the society we live in and make us question if the world on screen is that different from our own. The result is broad social commentary piece that wants to commentate on many social issues, and while it doesn’t reach the clarity it wants to, it does make for a wild ride.

Taking place in a distant dystopian version of Oakland, the film follows Cassius Green (Lakeith Stanfield), a down on his luck, late twenty year old who is struggling to find a job and pay rent. When he lands a job at a call center, he continues to struggle until he taps into his ‘white voice’ and rises through the ranks to becomes a power caller. As he ascends, Cassius finds himself questioning  his own morals as he chooses between standing by his principles to help those at the bottom or joining the elite for self-benefit.

Joining Stanfield is a commendable all star cast that help play both sides of the fence in Cassius’ moral dilemma. On one side you have Detriot and Squeeze. The former played by Tessa Thompson who is Cassius’ girlfriend and main moral objector while the latter is Cassius’ former co-worker leading a union protest played by Steven Yeun. On the other side you have Steve Lift, a drug fueled billionaire played by Armie Hammer who is enticing Cassius’ with riches to bring his power caller talents on a new venture. To the film’s benefit, the supporting cast plays a major role in depicting the nuances and motivations in Cassius’ actions and help develop the moral compass and messages within the film.

Sorry to Bother You covers a spectrum of social ailments, but never dives deep on any particular issue. Instead, the film paints a broad picture of society where anything and everything is heightened, hyperbolized, and exaggerated to reflect society as it currently stands. When you see absurd television shows that ask you to kick the ‘shit’ out of people, a ‘worry-free’ job that locks you into a life time of service, or a power callers profiting off of weapon sales, you’ll get a sense of how out of hand society feels. The film likes to offer a variety of individual statements that provide brief commentary on any given issue ranging from race relations and labor practices to capitalism and colonialism, but in doing so it can feel unfocused in the name of being all encompassing. It has a lot to say and no concise way of saying it, and that can be problematic.

But the film is nothing short of unique. Everything has a sense of style from the wide and varied characters to the visual techniques at play. The aforementioned capitalism run amuck is often critiqued using a variety of stylized choices such as Cassius dropping into the real life homes of clients when he calls them, the close ups of Detroit’s interchangeable earrings that have punchy subtext, and an ending that is so crazy you’ll be doing double takes. And that’s what makes Sorry to Bother You so memorable: how outlandish it can be. For all the inconsistencies it may have with its message, it makes up for with how holistically committed it is to its style. While it does stumble, it continues to shine a light on society with humor, satire, and swagger that is commendable to say the least.

Sorry to Bother You tackles an array of social issues such race, labor, colonialism, capitalism, and inequality in a science fiction comedy package. The result is a very clever film that often spreads itself too thin, but paints a hyperbolized version of society as a whole that underscores the injustice in our own. The film’s broad strokes can leave it feeling unfocused and mirky especially by the end when the film gets progressively weirder and weirder, but I can say I enjoyed the social reflection of it all.

Score: 3.75/5 Stars