Review: ‘Poor Things’: An Odyssey of Sexual Liberation

In Poor Things, director Yorgos Lanthimos (The Favorite, The Killing of a Sacred Deer) crafts a tale reminiscent of a mythical hero’s journey, telling the story of a woman newly created by mad science embarking on a quest to discover herself. Bella Baxter (Emma Stone) is returned from the dead by Dr. Godwin Baxter (Willem Dafoe) with no memories and the mind of an infant, rapidly maturing as her brain grows to fit her body. She exists entirely within Godwin’s control as a scientific experiment, her movements meticulously documented by his assistant (Ramy Youssef) who quickly becomes infatuated with her. At the same time, Bella begins to discover her own sexuality, finding enjoyment in pleasure but confused by social constraints and soon desiring to see the world outside Godwin’s abode. An opportunity for her escape comes in the form of Duncan Wedderburn (Mark Ruffalo), a hedonistic lawyer who offers to take her away. The pair subsequently embark on a sex-filled tour of the Mediterranean, where Bella discovers within herself a deep desire to help the unfortunate of the world.

Continue reading “Review: ‘Poor Things’: An Odyssey of Sexual Liberation”

Review: ‘Cruella’ Doesn’t Disappoint, Surprisingly

Live-action reboots of animated classics have been all the rage lately. Disney in particular found its sweet spot with them, a cash cow that produces a comical amount of box office gold with a simple flick of the wrist. Reimagining these well-loved properties appeals to both new generations of kids who have easy access to streaming content, as well as to the older crowd who place ridiculous sentimental worth on the stories and their characters. But the blueprint is stale. These films typically follow the source material to a T to not offend the fans who aren’t always agreeable to change.

Continue reading “Review: ‘Cruella’ Doesn’t Disappoint, Surprisingly”

Review: ‘Zombieland: Double Tap’ Lives Up to the Hype

Zombieland: Double Tap, directed by Ruben Fleischer, director of the original Zombieland, has Woody Harrelson, Jesse Eisenberg, Emma Stone, and Abigail Breslin reprising their roles as Tallahassee, Columbus, Wichita, and Little Rock respectively. Zombieland: Double Tap follows the four as they encounter more zombies, remaining survivors, and the advanced deceased. The narrative begins with the four protagonists facing their own individual challenges, but as the film progresses, they are united as they encounter the remaining survivors of the zombie apocalypse.

What made this film impressive was its acting, especially the performances of Woody Harrelson and Jesse Eisenberg. Once again, Columbus’ narration about Zombieland is clever and quirky, giving out both old and new details to the audience. From his recap of the first film to his introduction of rules for surviving Zombieland, his character sheds light and humor on the story. As for Tallahassee, his character development was unexpected, given to what happened to him in the first film. Here, his personality takes the spotlight more, especially when he meets and interacts with the new survivors. Additionally, when it comes to his zombie killing moments, he’s still as entertaining as he was in the original Zombieland.

Part of what didn’t contribute positively to the film were its obvious attempts to be “cool,” and some of the supporting cast. The frequent pop culture references were unnecessary and distracting from the plot. While some of them made sense, most felt like they were put there just for the audience to have a shallow laugh that they’d forget immediately afterwards. Madison (Zoey Deutch), one of the new supporting characters, seemed like she should be fitted into a high-school flick as the alpha female instead of a comedy/horror zombie film. In the film, her character is depicted as a spoiled child that the main protagonists just found in the wrong place at the wrong time. It’s clear her purpose in the narrative is to offer some fresh humor, but she just comes off as annoying and adds little to no value to the story.

Overall, for the most part, this sequel was enjoyable and fun. There were a couple places that were stale and unworthy of praise, but considering the ten year span between the original and the sequel, Zombieland: Double Tap lived up to the hype. The acting was superb, the zombies were amazing to witness, and Ruben Fleischer clearly knew what he was doing.

4/5 STARS

UW Film Club Podcast #11: The Favourite

“Favor is a breeze that shifts direction all the time. Then in an instant you’re back listening to scabrous podcasts.” This week Cynthia Li, Sabrina Pearson, and Ivy Pottinger-Glass sit down to discuss Yorgos Lanthimos’ latest film: The Favourite. Set in the early 18th century, this dark comedy period piece follows the real life events of Queen Anne as her long time friend and a servant compete for her favor. We discuss the film’s use of classic Lanthimos humor, its unique visual style, and what the film’s award potential may be on this week’s episode so drop a listen now!

On this week’s episode: Cynthia Li, Sabrina Pearson, Ivy Pottinger-Glass, and Greg Arietta.

You can find us on Facebook at /UWFilmClub, and on Twitter and Instagram @FilmClubUW.  Make sure to rate, comment, and subscribe to our podcast on Apple Podcasts and Soundcloud, and tune in every Monday for a new episode of the UW Film Club Podcast!

Review: Cary Fukunaga’s Maniac Tackles Mental Health Like No Other

“Doesn’t seem right to be telling people what’s wrong with themselves before they figure it out for themselves.”

After Beasts of No Nation and a tumultuous run on IT, Cary Joji Fukunaga has teamed up with Netflix again to bring us his latest project, Maniac: a retro-future drama about mental health. With it, Fukunaga maintains his serious subject matter like that of True Detective or Beasts of No Nation, but adds in some dark comedy to create brevity in a rather serious topic. The result is a ten part mini-series that commentates on the mental struggles that come with traumatizing events and how the road to recovery isn’t as easy as everyone thinks it is.

Maniac is not a traditional film ‘film,’ but its construction speaks otherwise. It’s a ten episode mini series on Netflix with no theatrical release, so initially one would assume this to be relegated to the TV category, but consider this: there is only one title card, one director across all ten episodes, and there are no opening credits at the beginning of each episode. Think of Maniac in the same vein as Twin Peaks: The Return, OJ Made in America, or the forthcoming The Ballad of Buster Scruggs; the hairsplitter in all of us might raise question with the division of the ‘film,’ but make no mistake, this feels like one continuous, self-contained piece of cinema.  

Our main protagonists are Annie (Emma Stone) and Owen (Jonah Hill): the former a drug abuser who uses to repress the memories of her past, and the later a down on his luck, paranoid schizophrenic who is the odd duck of the family but who is now being called upon to protect the family’s name in court. The two are brought together via a drug trial at the NPB Corporation, a pharmaceutical conglomerate on the verge of creating a new drug therapy which aims to rid the mind of any problem. Together the two undergo the trial phase with the hope they will be absolved of their ailments, but as they progress, they learn that overcoming their demons is something not done easily. 

Intentionally so, Maniac keeps its cards close to its chest. The show operates under a very cryptic plot structure where revelations in both Annie’s and Owen’s narratives are only revealed as they progress through the trial. This structure not only works to engage the audience to watch the next episode, but the piece-meal approach has a mystique to it, opening our protagonist’s past in weird and unconventional ways. Instead of placing events out of order or merely using a flashback, Maniac uses the A-B-C steps of the drug trial to open Annie’s and Owen’s past. After taking each pill (A for agonia, B for behavioral, and C for confrontation), the show enters what it calls a ‘reflection’: a fantasy/dreamlike state where Annie and Owen are put in outlandish scenarios that draw parallels to their own reality. With the exception of the A phase, these scenarios are cryptic, causing audiences to read between the lines in order to understand the internal issues, guilts, and backstories of our characters. This method can be off-putting at first as they pull you out of the series’s established mode, but they often result in profound character moments that are at the core of what makes Maniac so compelling. 

Maniac is interested in the complex issues found in overcoming one’s demons. Both Annie and Owen have a resistance to moving forward from events in their past, and as the trials progress, they try to tackle their own with the help of a ‘magic pill.’ What Fukunaga conveys so well is the unsatisfactory sentiment that comes from the quick and easy solution to our internal struggles. It showcases the difficulty in overcoming these traumas, and that no matter how much we struggle, fight, or combat these inner demons, they never go. They are not fleeting emotions, but rather ones that linger and rear their heads in ugly ways. It says that these struggles are a part of you, that it is ok to grapple with them, and that before you can move past them, you need to reconcile and confront them. Skeletons that inhabit our psyche are not easily vacated with a pill or a quick fix, they are a process that takes time.

Tying these themes together is Maniac’s retro-future aesthetic and dark comedy. The series most closely resembles that of Spike Jonze’s Her which took on a similar look and feel. Technology that opens one’s mind is bulky and dated looking, tube computers run DOS-like programs, and adverts that could only come from the 80s are all a part of the surreal future Maniac paints. In tandem with it is the use of dark comedy which keeps things light. This isn’t a Marvel affair where the humor kills the tone, but rather, the humor here is intrinsically tied to the film’s tonal consistency. Jonah Hill dressed up like Post Malone while having a serious moment with someone who radiates heat waves is something I would never think would work, but it actually manages to hit home deep and substantive meaning. However, there is the occasional outlandish moment that doesn’t work; these moments can most commonly be sourced from the aforementioned ‘reflection’ sequences and can have eyebrow-raising effects, but the missteps are completely overshadowed by the times when it does work because when it does, boy is it good.

As a side note, I think Dan Romer’s score is excellent. I don’t have too much to say, but there are great standout pieces like ‘Annie and Owen’ and ‘Blind Spots’ that help convey a tremendous sense of sympathy, struggle, and heightened emotion. It’s all so beautiful and I love it dearly. 

For all its abnormalities and strangeness, Maniac has something to say and an unequivocally unique voice in saying it. From its stylish dressings to its cryptic narrative, Fukunaga has made a ten episode series that not only presents the bleak realities of mental illness, but promotes the process of getting better, and surprisingly, it is a series I wish to revisit so I may find new meaning in all its nuance and subtext, something I can’t say that about any other show. Simply put, Maniac is unforgettable.

Score: 4.25/5