Review: ‘Napoleon’: A Grand Yet Uneven Epic from Ridley Scott

At the age of 85, Ridley Scott is still consistently releasing films every couple of years around the holidays. Scott has been a Hollywood titan since he directed the legendary film Alien in 1979. Since then, he has had the budget to make any movie he wants, and Ridley is not afraid to take a big swing. Napoleon is his latest effort, detailing the life of the French general with Joaquin Phoenix in the titular role, analyzing his battles as well as his intense relationship with his wife Josephine (Vanessa Kirby). The movie draws heavily from Stanley Kubrick’s Barry Lyndon, which was adapted from a novel that was written shortly after Napoleon Bonaparte’s death. Kubrick famously attempted to make a movie about Napoleon but could not get the project off the ground. Ridley Scott realizes Kubrick’s idea 50 years later, although Napoleon still feels as though something is missing.

Continue reading “Review: ‘Napoleon’: A Grand Yet Uneven Epic from Ridley Scott”

UW Film Club Podcast #64 – Joker

“I used to think my life was a tragedy, but now I realize, it’s a podcast where some college students talk about movies.”

Joker, one of the most controversial films of 2019, has now (for better or worse) unexpectedly garnered 11 Oscar nominations – the most for this awards season, and for any comic book film in history. And while podcast host Jim is mostly indifferent about the film, he sits down to talk to a few special guests who enjoyed it more than he did. In this episode, we talk about Joaquin Phoenix’s impassioned performance, the film’s lack of subtlety and depth in its message about *society* and treatment of the disenfranchised/mentally ill, as well as whether it holds up on its own amongst the DC mythos from whence it originated. You want to hear another joke? Well, you’ll get what you deserve on the 64th episode of the UW Film Club podcast! Tune in now!

On this episode: Jim Saunders, Leila Okorie, Diana Raykova and Ajay Rawat

You can find us on Facebook at /UWFilmClub, and on Twitter and Instagram @FilmClubUW. Make sure to rate, comment, and subscribe to our podcast on Apple Podcasts, Soundcloud, Spotify, and Google Play, and tune in every Monday for a new episode of the UW Film Club Podcast!

Review: Strong Performances Lead the Way In Don’t Worry, He Won’t Get Far On Foot

This film was seen at the 44th Seattle International International Film Festival. The film is now in wide release in Seattle. You can read our interview with director Gus Van Sant and actor Beth Ditto here.

After a critical misstep in Sea of Trees, Gus Van Sant returns with Don’t Worry, He Won’t Get Far On Foot (DWHWGFOF). The film has long been on the back burner for Van Sant who started it in the early 2000s with the late Robin Williams originally attached to star, but after a series of untimely set backs, was ultimately delayed. Now, in his first written and directed work since Paranoid Park in 2007, Van Sant has picked the project back up with a new set of stars and an aim to tell the story of a man seeking sobriety. The result is a film with terrific performances that make the film worth the watch, but which are complicated by the nonlinear narrative Van Sant strings together.

Our story follows John Callahan (Joaquin Phoenix): a struggling alcoholic who gets into a car accident that leaves him paralyzed. In an effort to save himself from his destructive behavior, he joins an AA group to help cure him of his addiction. Stubborn and persistent, Callahan finds the road to recover to be much harder than he anticipated, but finds an outlet in drawing cartoons that soon find a place in a local paper. 

The film takes a nonlinear approach to its story telling. Cutting between various pre- and post-accident moments, we get to see alternating portraits of Callahan: one of him suffering from his affliction and the other of him trying to recover from it. The back and forth is the most jarring aspect of the film as it can often disorient the viewer; at times, it can feel as if you are continuing a sequence only to learn via continuity that the film is now jumping in time. Perhaps done to replicate the haziness of Callahan’s life, perhaps done to as a stylistic choice, but nonetheless, a jarring effect.

The film is largely carried by terrific performances across the board. After an award worthy performance in You Were Never Really Here, Joaquin Phoenix delivers another well-acted performance as John Callahan; showing the frustrations of addiction, the turbulence of recovery, and the acceptance in moving forward, it is a multifaceted performance that provides the back bone of the film. In supporting roles, we have Jonah Hill, Jack Black, and Rooney Mara — the former two being terrific while the later unnecessary. Hill plays Callahan’s sponsor and carries a smart and light persona that is underscored by his own personal issues. It’s a career best performance that can only be rivaled by his role as Donnie in The Wolf of Wallstreet.  Black on the other hand plays a very minor role — so small that he only appears in three scenes —, but, even its minuteness, he still fires on all cylinders; Black plays Callahan’s acquaintance who causes the paralyzing accident and serves as a step in Callahan’s recovery process. While small, his third and final scene is the best three minutes of Jack Black the world has even seen, as we see a man freed from a decade of guilt in the course of forty-five seconds.

On the short end is Mara who’s role is questionable in the film. Serving as a love interest, Mara plays a nurse who starts out as an aide for Callahan, but during a later encounter, they start becoming romantically involved. This romance could be described as nothing short of a stint as her involvement comes and goes quickly, acting as a brief moment in Callahan’s recovery process. It has aspects of contributing to Callahan’s overall character, but it’s rather minor, and could be omitted from the film without question. It’s an unfortunate waste of talent.

These performances really are at the heart of DWHWGFOF. Callahan and the characters around him embody the multidimensional themes found on the road to recovery, and even though the film’s structure up ends some of what they accomplish, it can be appreciated for the incredible performances that are true standouts. If you are ok with piecing together the narrative, you can find solace in performances that move the emotional needle above the norm.

Score 3.75/5

 

Want more? Read our brief interview with director Gus Van Sant and actor Beth Ditto.

SIFF 2018: Gus Van Sant and Beth Ditto Interview for Don’t Worry, He Won’t Get Far On Foot

During the Closing Night Screening of Don’t Worry, He Won’t Get Far on Foot, we were able to get a few questions in with director Gus Van Sant (Good Will Hunting, Milk) and actress Beth Ditto. The interview was conducted in tandem with Darlene Graham from SIFF News and Greg Arietta. As Van Sant snacked on some Skittles before the show, we were able to ask why this film was so relevant for today and how Van Sant was able to illicit so many stellar  performances in the film. DWHWGFOF comes out on July 13th, but you can check out our interview below.


This interview has been edited for clarity and readability.

DG: I wanted to ask how you relate to your character?

BD: Well, I think it’s the only character that I could really do because I don’t think [Reba — her character] is that far remove from who I really am. I live in the South, and the whole description [of the role] was worth it. I feel like it just makes sense for me. She was a redneck and I grew up with rednecks [who were] women with really big hearts that just love to talk, but also really brutal. I thought that life wasn’t really that serious. We were really religious. We thought there would be this reward some where else, so dying young wasn’t a big deal. It was just basically, “Smoke until you fucking die.” The person I was thinking about when I was reading the description of Reba was this woman named Jamie who smoked in a hospital room, had lung cancer, and died at 47. 

GA: So Gus, there are so many great performances in this film, how did you as a director illicit so many great performances from a broad cast?

GVS: I try to make everything seem like its not that important so that it’s not…

BD: A burden?

GVS: … a burden, yah. I want the actors to feel comfortable and they just go. Right? *Looks at Ditto*

BD: For me, yah. I only worked with you for like three days to a week, so I can’t say that for everyone else. 

GVS: You know, just stay out of their way, and hopefully they’ll get into it. If I get too involved… They usually have their own thing they want to do [with the character], so I usually try to stay out of the way. Did I did that with you? *Looks at Ditto*

BD: Yah, you finally got out of my way. I think that’s the only reason I could do it because I could just do what I wanted to do and it was encouraged. Also, there is something also about the other people that were in it that it felt like a good group of people who got along. That makes things feel a lot easier. I think the curation of the actors are a huge part of it. If we didn’t have people that meshed together, I don’t think it would of been that easy. I felt encouraged to be myself… maybe too much! I felt really comfortable and I’ve never done it before.  Sometimes I felt like I was gonna throw up. I get nervous, but never like that. I don’t get performance anxiety really, but [acting] made me scared to death. I had to have a phone call before because I needed to talk about it. I don’t even know what it was about. 

GVS: But then when we did it, was it easy? The next day did you have anxiety?

BD: Oh so easy. But the next day I did also, because I don’t want to [look bad] in front of professionals in the moment. I don’t want to put them off if I don’t talk at the right time. Which is hard for me… not to talk. So silence is a good key [with acting]. But yah, I got comfortable really easily. But you *looking at Van Sant* really set people at ease.

DG: Can you tell why you felt the story of Jon Callahan was important to tell right now? 

GVS: We started the project in the 90s. It was a good story to tell in the 90s, for the 2000s, the 2010s, or today. It’s a timeless story, so it’s always current. 

BD: I’ll add to that. We need a Jon Callahan story right now. That’s a good reason!

Review: Lynne Ramsay’s Dark Character Study with You Were Never Really Here

There are few directors like Lynne Ramsay in the business. Since her debut film Ratcatcher in 1999, Ramsay has only made three other films: Morvern Callar in 2002, We Need To Talk About Kevin in 2011, and now You Were Never Really Here in 2018. If you’re like me, the first thing you notice is how far spaced out the films are, and while Ramsay’s filmography is small, it is powerful, each one garnering critical praise and even inspiring a young Barry Jenkins. As such, whenever she releases a film, people should take note. It’s not like she’s making any film. She’s making her film, acting as not only the director, but also the writer and producer. Ramsay only seems concerned with telling worthwhile stories, and You Were Never Really Here is just that: a dark character study that leverages every element to tell a compelling story with rich meaning.

Based on the book of the same name, You Were Never Really Here follows Joe (Joaquin Phoenix), a former service member who has become a hired gun that saves trafficked girls. Through his experiences at war and in his line of work, he has become ruthless in his methods, but suffers from extreme emotional distress that permeates his life. In his latest job, he is hired to rescue Nina (Ekaternia Samsonov), the daughter of a Congressman who has been kidnapped and forced into sex trafficking. But, while on this job, Joe finds there may be a plot bigger than himself working in the background that pushes him to his mental limits.

The film is very much concerned with who Joe is and how his past torments his mental psyche. Phoenix offers a perfectly subdued performance that depicts a broken man navigating a seedy world who is on the brink of ending it all, but always finding one last thing to live for. The cold, brutal acts of violence serve as outlets for the mental pain he carries, but always pushing him even further towards complete mental degradation. The performance is subtle yet incredibly rich, always holding back until there are moments of intense violence or emotion that utilize Phoenix’s far reaching range. His portrayal allows audiences to always have their finger on Joe, knowing when he’s collected and when he’s suffering, and it is this comprehension that lets us empathize with him and understand the actions he takes.

So much of this film’s potency can be accredited to the incredible work of Ramsay. As mentioned before, she directed, wrote, and produced the feature and there’s a methodical nature that can be felt within nearly every scene. The sense of foreboding demise or mental conflict are not only carried on the back of Phoenix, but also in the techniques Ramsay implements. While there are innumerable “did you see what she did there” moments throughout the film, there is one scene in particular where Joe busts up an apartment used for trafficking, and when it’s all said and done, you are left astounded by the execution of it all. There isn’t a lot of dialog in the film, so much of the story has to be told visually. To convey complex emotions or plot points without words is a hurdle in and of itself, but Ramsay makes it appear effortless, resulting in some masterful work.

And these inner conflicts play out audibly as well. Radiohead artist Jonny Greenwood (who I praised for his Phantom Thread score) is returning to collaborate with Ramsay and brings a frantic score that is loud, unwieldily, and spastic, but in a very good way. Hard hits on string instruments that drop swiftly and out of no where. Irritating out of tune notes that move into momentous beats. And uneven melodies that are on the verge of collapse, but always maintaining a sense of consistency all add to an unsettling experience that effectively conveys the sense of conflict within our central character. Instruments seemingly compete for dominance within songs, which makes sincere moments all the more powerful when they play in perfect harmony. It’s a monumental score that works perfectly at creating the film’s overall tone, while also conveying sentiments that are left unsaid, which is hard to say about most film scores, but characteristic of truly amazing ones. (If you want a sample of what’s at play, I recommend Sandy’s Necklace or The Hunt as exemplary pieces that embrace this synchronized chaos.)

From the opening moments to its incredibly powerful ending, You Were Never Really Here offers an unrelenting look at the trauma from our past and the paths we take to cope with them. While the narrative is quite sinister, it feels holistically essential to the film’s main point; it goes to dark places because the character demands it. We need to see what this world has done to Joe, how he got those scars, and how those physical artifacts translate to mental burdens. The film reenforces our innate human faults that allow our past to haunt us, while also providing a glimmering light at the end of the tunnel where we can move past ourselves and into a brighter future, or as the film likes to put it, a beautiful day.

Score: 4.25/5