Review: ‘Top Gun: Maverick’ is Mythic Filmmaking

The brutal churn of state-sanctioned violence beyond America’s borders inevitably takes its toll on the people who make up the armed forces. The original Top Gun can be read as comrades coping with intense, dangerous pressure through fierce competition, though it would require overlooking how it is chiefly a (albeit very fun!) piece of American military jingoism. However, even it acknowledges that service is not without sacrifice and that some will inevitably be put in harm’s way for the sake of protecting a nation’s interests.

Continue reading “Review: ‘Top Gun: Maverick’ is Mythic Filmmaking”

Review: ‘No Sudden Move’ Takes You for a Ride

Before the main caper in No Sudden Move even begins, we’re given narrative elements that imply a crime film of truly epic proportions: two rival gangs, a desperate gangster looking for a way out, a shady job from a mysterious benefactor, and a codebook full of secrets that threatens to bring the criminal underworld of Detroit crumbling down. The movie’s pace matches these expectations as Curt Goynes (Don Cheadle) and Ronald Russo (Benicio del Toro) race against the clock, unraveling a conspiracy while trying to net an even bigger score. By the film’s end,however, once all is revealed, their score is cast in a different, less renegaded light, forcing these criminals—as well as the audience—to reevaluate their expectations.

Continue reading “Review: ‘No Sudden Move’ Takes You for a Ride”

Review: ‘The Report’ is Spotlight Crossed with Zero Dark Thirty

The Report tells the real story of senate staffer Daniel Jones and the Senate Intelligence Committee as they uncover the horrifying details about the CIA’s use of torture during the War on Terror. In 2012, Jones (Adam Driver) and his team created an over 6,000-page report that alleged that the CIA’s enhanced interrogation techniques were torture and resulted in no new information from prisoners. The report and its authors were faced with push back from the CIA and the White House as they tried to hide conclusions reached in the report.

When sitting down to watch The Report, I was expecting to see Spotlight crossed with Zero Dark Thirty, and in short, that is exactly what I got. First and foremost, The Report has all the pieces of an investigative journalism story like Spotlight. As we follow their investigation, we hear a healthy amount of the government jargon and acronyms that take a while to get used to and understand. Inter-cut throughout the film are flashbacks to 9/11 and the beginning of the War on Terror. Many of these flashbacks showed the torture of prisoners at CIA black sites. As the film progresses, the torture becomes more and more graphic, and yet it is never gratuitous. The flashbacks show how the prisoners where treated and emphasize why the work that Jones and his team is doing is so important.

Adam Driver gives a stellar performance as the leading man and further cements himself as an amazing actor who also happens to be in Star Wars and not the other way around. Annette Bening and Jon Hamm also give great supporting performances as Senator Dianne Feinstein and White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, but both are easily outshined by Adam Driver.

As with most films based on a true story, they are a Hollywood dramatization of the real-life events. The Report is no exception to this commonality; there is bound to be a bias, especially since there are politics involved. However, in comparison, The Report actually seems to have very little bias, as the film tries to focus on only the facts, even though some of them are exaggerated a little to make them more interesting for the big screen. One thing that stands out in the cinematography is how the flashback sequences are presented. In the flashbacks, there is a noticeable change in lighting and color of the film to give it a hazy or fuzzy look, to emphasize the political ambiguity of the recounting of past events and how they are swayed to favor certain people.

The Report gives an account of real-life events that is not dry and boring, and yet it isn’t a political thriller either. If you’re interested in what happened with the CIA and their use of torture during the War on Terror, but don’t want to read the dry Wikipedia page, then check out The Report and Adam Driver will tell you all about it.

3/5 STARS

Review: ‘Lucy In The Sky’ is a Wonder to Behold, If You’re Into that Sort of Thing

Noah Hawley’s Lucy In The Sky was not exactly anticipated by the population at large. With a 23% on Rotten Tomatoes at the time of this review, it seems destined to fall into obscurity almost as soon as it has been released. Which is, in this moviegoer’s opinion, a crying shame.

Lucy In The Sky’s titular Lucy Cola is an astronaut in some undefined, vaguely present-day era who comes back from a mission to space only to find herself changed. Not in a horror movie sense, by some alien contagion, but in a philosophical sense. How do you go back to your daily routine once you have seen all of humanity from above? How do you return to your old perspective now that you know what is out there? As Lucy struggles to return to herself and qualify for the next spaceflight, she begins to unravel, and a series of dire choices leads her farther from the heavens than ever.

As anyone who has ever seen one episode of Legion will know, Noah Hawley has a unique, directorial eye. The editing of this movie was crazy, but, more importantly, engaging. Its most abrasive quality is its constantly shifting aspect ratio. While this didn’t bother me, I can easily see how it could start to get on others’ nerves. On a less visual note, I thoroughly enjoyed Natalie Portman’s portrayal of a woman in love with the beauty of the world, desperate to maintain control of her life and herself while also achieving her goals.

However, with visuals and a story this crazy, this movie should have had a watertight narrative. Unfortunately, it just felt jumbled at points, with metaphors and motivations mixing together and losing clarity as the film reached its climax. Additionally, the script isn’t always easy to take seriously, and characters sometimes make choices that seem to be wholly unmotivated.

At its core, Lucy In The Sky is a film about boundaries, and the cost of transcending those boundaries. As the film’s aspect ratios bend, distort, and break, we wonder how much of the picture we’ve been missing, and we too begin to miss the transcendent moments of visual freedom from the film’s opening spaceflight. And, not to give away the ending, we learn that we don’t have to go all the way to outer space to find beauty. We can find beauty everywhere we look.

Lucy In The Sky is the kind of movie that doesn’t come out every day. It’s bold. It takes risks. Some of those risks pay off, and some don’t, but it certainly gives every choice its all. And shouldn’t that be rewarded? Shouldn’t we celebrate creativity, even when it’s not pitch perfect?
Lucy In The Sky is not for everyone. It is certainly not an easy movie to enjoy. However, I would encourage you to not let this film drift into the abyss. It’s certainly worth seeing on the big screen. Maybe you’ll leave the film like I did, with your perspective just a little bit different.

3/5 STARS

Review: Bad Times at the El Royale Taps Into Moral Choice

Seven years after the release of his subversive horror film, Cabin in the Woods, Drew Goddard returns to the directing with the mystery thriller, Bad Times at the El Royale. In the meanwhile, Goddard has kept himself busy with scripts like The Martian, but for him to return to directing probably means he sees something special in this particular script. Something has drawn him out of the writers room and back into the director’s chair, and after seeing it, there is much more to the film than what its unique premise sells itself on.

The story takes place at the El Royale, a remote hotel located on the border between Nevada and California. After the outlawing of gambling, the hotel falls in popularity, and now, a sole bell boy (Lewis Pullman) runs the whole hotel. One day, four guests converge on the hotel: a priest (Jeff Bridges), a salesman (Jon Hamm), a singer (Cynthia Erivo), and a young woman (Dakotah Johnson), each with their own stories of why they’re here, but as we soon will learn, appearances aren’t what they seem as secrets unfold and paths cross one another.

The film has the feel of something like Murder on the Orient Express; a cast of characters are brought together under strange circumstances to a remote location when things start to go awry. It’s a proximate who-done-it tale, if you will, full of mystery and suspicion, where everyone has ulterior motives, and every action is questioned. This looming sense of distrust can be attributed to the film’s construction. The story is told in a chapter format focusing on individual characters. We start one chapter that picks up where another left off or we end a chapter on a cliff hanger that is only resolved with another chapter later on. In that way, the film is acting like a narrative puzzle, asking audiences to piece together events, characters, and motives as they’re provided. 

This type of construction is a major strength of the film. Perhaps self-explanatory, but a mystery thriller requires a true mystery in order for it work as intended, and to Goddard’s credit, the script is layered in such a way where things are never clear. Not in a crippling way, but rather in a conscious way, one that engages your curiosity. A priest, salesman, and singer are clearly not all brought to the El Royale out of sheer circumstance (though it does have the makings for a good joke set up), so it is inherent in that suspicion where much of the film’s appeal comes from. As Goddard plays his cards, there is a revelatory quality where back stories and motives are revealed that in turn satisfies our desire to connect all the dots. It’s a feeling that will surely evoke one or two ‘ah-hahs’ out of you. 

The film also extends beyond its star-filled cast and novelty aesthetics. One of the quaint points about the setting is that the hotel is split in half by the California-Nevada border, allowing guests to choose housing in one side or the other. It isn’t until late in the film that this detail of choice becomes more profound. Morality and aspects of choice emerge as its predominate theme. The line that divides the hotel acts a metaphorical moral line in the film, where our characters choose between right and wrong time and again to make declarations about who they are, and even if there is only two sides, straddling the line that divides them, in the gray area so to speak, is very well possible. 

However, there are some hiccups in this tale. Chris Hemsworth’s character, a Charles Manson-esk hippie cult leader named Billy Lee, enters the film in the last act and forces the film to enter a line of questioning about morality. Up until this point, the code of morality is only noted. When Hemsworth enters, the film sits you down and forces you into this new mode of thinking. Where you might of been trying to solve the mystery at the start, you are now entered into a new mode about morality. It’s not until this revelatory moment where you realize the actions taken prior have some deeper underlying meaning. I can’t say that this shake up is detrimental to the film, but it should be noted that the film flips like a switch as it narrows in on one scene for an extended period to nail down its message. 

The film is fixated on telling a tale of moral choice. Through our band of characters and puzzling narrative, Goddard has created a mystery thriller where the moral compass emerges as the conflict at hand unfolds. While there is a heavy handed approach to its messaging near the end, the moral conflict, winding mystery, and star-filled cast add up to a film that well exceeds its minor shortcomings. As enigmatic as it is engaging, Bad Times at the El Royale is a an excellent mystery film that will surely satisfy your inner Sherlock and Kantian philosopher. 

Score: 4/5