UW Film Club Podcast #51 – Ali

“Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee,
his hands can’t hit what his eyes can’t see.”

Autumn 2019 quarter has FINALLY begun, and on top of new classes comes a multitude of new movies out in theaters. Amongst these new releases is the new Will Smith-led action film, Gemini Man, from legendary director Ang Lee. In celebration of Will Smith’s diverse and fascinating acting career, we’ve decided to cover his dramatic turning point: the Michael Mann directed Ali! Portraying a figure like Muhammad Ali is certainly no easy feat, and Smith’s ability to command the screen with gravitas is a reminder of his range and raw talent. In this podcast, we give a retrospective on his career as a whole, and how his role as Ali propelled him to where he is now. Jump into the ring and listen to the 51st episode of the UW Film Club Podcast now!

On this episode: Jim Saunders and Cynthia Li.

You can find us on Facebook at /UWFilmClub, and on Twitter and Instagram @FilmClubUW. Make sure to rate, comment, and subscribe to our podcast on Apple Podcasts, Soundcloud, Spotify, and Google Play, and tune in every Monday for a new episode of the UW Film Club Podcast

UW Film Club Podcast #50 – Inception

“She locked away a podcast, deep inside her hard drive, something she once knew to be true…but chose to forget.”

Autumn Quarter 2019 is less than a week away, and to ease our listeners into this next phase, we’ve chosen to cover the awesome action drama Inception, directed by legendary director Christopher Nolan. Just as groundbreaking today as it was in 2010, Inception manages to feature a daringly original and cerebral script with mind-bending set pieces, all while maintaining mainstream sensibilities to make it accessible for general audiences. In this episode, we discuss the film’s popularity (amongst a lengthy IMDb vs. Letterboxd tangent), the high concept, detached nature of Nolan’s films, as well as what it all means thematically. Was it all a dream? Find out now by listening to the 50th episode of the UW Film Club Podcast!

On this episode: Jim Saunders and Cynthia Li.

You can find us on Facebook at /UWFilmClub, and on Twitter and Instagram @FilmClubUW. Make sure to rate, comment, and subscribe to our podcast on Apple Podcasts, Soundcloud, Spotify, and Google Play, and tune in every Monday for a new episode of the UW Film Club Podcast

UW Film Club Podcast #49 – It

“Okay, so let me get this straight. It comes out, from wherever, to record podcasts for, like, a year, and then what? It just goes into hibernation?”

Here on the UW Film Club Podcast, we’ve managed to do something completely unheard of: cover a relevant movie in the same week it’s relevant! This time, we’ve decided to reflect on the 2017 horror flick It, just in time for the release of It: Chapter Two! Although only one of us have seen the sequel so far, we talk about how the two compare, we praise the stellar cast and performances, and ponder over whether its blend of horror and comedy is as sharp and well-balanced as was initially perceived. It’s time to float on the 49th episode of the UW Film Club Podcast! Tune in now!

On this episode: Jim Saunders and Cynthia Li.

You can find us on Facebook at /UWFilmClub, and on Twitter and Instagram @FilmClubUW. Make sure to rate, comment, and subscribe to our podcast on Apple Podcasts, Soundcloud, Spotify, and Google Play, and tune in every Monday for a new episode of the UW Film Club Podcast!

UW Film Club Podcast #48 – Ready or Not

“I can’t believe that in half an hour I will be a part of the Le Domas podcast dynasty, empire?

Uh, dominion, we prefer dominion.”

Whether we’re ready for it or not, the Autumn 2019 quarter is almost here. Fortunately though, there’s still time to sit down and talk about one of the biggest surprise hits of the summer, and, dare I say it, the year: Ready or Not! With a smart script that features an uncommonly well-achieved blend of dark comedy and exciting thrills, it is (in our opinion) one of the coolest movies to close this summer out with. Are you ready to hear what else we think about this surprising gem? Then listen to the 48th episode of the UW Film Club Podcast now!

On this episode: Jim Saunders and Zachary Anderson.

You can find us on Facebook at /UWFilmClub, and on Twitter and Instagram @FilmClubUW. Make sure to rate, comment, and subscribe to our podcast on Apple Podcasts, Soundcloud, Spotify, and Google Play, and tune in every Monday for a new episode of the UW Film Club Podcast!

UW Film Club Podcast #47 – Superbad

“Hawaii. All right, that’s good. That’s hard to trace, I guess. Wait… you changed your name to… Podcaster?”

In this 47th episode of the UW Film Club Podcast, we talk one of the defining comedies of the 2000s, the endlessly quotable comedy Superbad! Amongst our many topics of discussion, we cover its contemporary relevance, acknowledge some of its more problematic elements as a sign of the times, and ponder over whether this counts as a coming-of-age film. How well does this hold up over 12 years after its initial release? Find out by tuning in now!

On this episode: Cynthia Li and Jim Saunders.

You can find us on Facebook at /UWFilmClub, and on Twitter and Instagram @FilmClubUW. Make sure to rate, comment, and subscribe to our podcast on Apple Podcasts, Soundcloud, Spotify, and Google Play, and tune in every Monday for a new episode of the UW Film Club Podcast!

UW Film Club Podcast #46 – The Fast and the Furious

“You almost had me?! You never had me – you never even had your podcast!”

We’re a week late (as usual), but in honor of Hobbs and Shaw, we’ve decided to shift gears in reverse back to 2001, and take it back to where the franchise all started, with The Fast and the Furious! In this podcast, we draw comparisons to Kathryn Bigelow’s Point Break, talk about the legacy of the series, and ponder the appeal of Vin Diesel. Come along for the ride on the 46th episode of the UW Film Club Podcast!

On this episode: Cynthia Li and Jim Saunders.

You can find us on Facebook at /UWFilmClub, and on Twitter and Instagram @FilmClubUW. Make sure to rate, comment, and subscribe to our podcast on Apple Podcasts, Soundcloud, Spotify, and Google Play, and tune in every Monday for a new episode of the UW Film Club Podcast!

Review: A Love Triangle Converges in Louis Garrel’s ‘A Faithful Man’

With the New York Film Festival announcing their 57th selection earlier this week, it seems fitting that we get a Seattle release for a film that played there last year with A Faithful Man. Directed, co-written, and starring Louis Garrel (Two Friends), this film follows three shifting perspectives that revolve around one central love triangle, culminating in a romantic comedy with all the signature touches of French cinema.

Abel (Garrel) learns that his significant other Marianne (Laetitia Casta) cheated on him and now bears the child of lover Paul. After nine years, Paul dies, and Marianne reunites with her original lover. In the middle is Eve (Lily-Rose Depp) who is Paul’s sister and has been longing for Abel since she was a young teen. The indecisive Abel fluctuates between Marianne and Eve, and as expected, drama ensues.

The film is pitched as “a playful inversion of the patriarchal tropes of the French New Wave” which is seemingly true on the surface. One doesn’t have to look far to see how A Faithful Man is a gender-swapped, modified alteration of François Truffaut’s Jules and Jim (1962). In that role reversal though you do get some unsavory tropes and associations that come from two women trying to go after one man. Clearly not as egregious as something like The Layover (2017), but something that should be noted. Eve literally says she will engage in war with Marianne if she doesn’t leave Abel alone, so there’s that . . . but it’s closer to Truffaut’s film in the sense that there’s deeper substance than simply wanting to compete for the affections of an indecisive male.

Though the film has three rotating viewpoints, Abel’s story ends up taking center stage due to his narrative positioning. After already leaving him once, the lingering fear that Marianne might do it again prompts his torn feelings. Does he stay with someone he has a second chance with or does he go for someone who claims to have always loved him from the start with someone like Eve? It is this conflict that distances A Faithful Man away from other love triangle romance films, though not completely. The unavoidable tropes of lesser rom-coms become omnipresent during the film, so a narrative like this will inherently have those associations. I wouldn’t absolve the film of these archetypes, but I wouldn’t go as far to condemn them either, particularly because of the way Marianne is framed.

That being said it is a French rom-com, so take an American romantic comedy and give it a heavy, heavy dose of French drama and A Faithful Man is your result. Pining character desires take center stage as the internal monologues of Abel, Marianne, and Eve take on a considerably dramatic French edge to it. “I miss her, but we are far apart. My life echoes without meaning,” is the sort of thing you will hear, and much of the comedy comes from this band of drama. At one point, A Faithful Man momentarily turns into a ‘who-done-it’ mystery generating a good amount of suspicious drama between individuals while also retaining its humor due in part to the comedic, dry-pan deliverables of Marianne’s son (Joseph Engel). Instances like this that play off expectations of French dramas and diffuse it is one of the more pleasant and indulgent parts of the film.

At 86 minutes, A Faithful Man never overstays it’s welcome. It gets in and out with the right amount of urgency before the story becomes played out. During that time you’ll find some French humor that carries some poignant truth about relationships, trust, and our ability to remain faithful to our significant other. If you can look past the archetypal setup, you’ll find some mileage (and laughs) in this one.


A FAITHFUL MAN PLAYS AT NORTHWEST FILM FORUM FROM AUGUST 9TH TO THE 15TH. FOR OUR STUDENT READERS, MAKE SURE TO GET THEIR STUDENT DISCOUNT, $9 TICKETS AND $35 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP.

Review: ‘Once Upon a Time in Hollywood’ May As Well Be Tarantino’s Swan Song

Quentin Tarantino is a filmmaker, yes, but he is first and foremost a film fanatic – each release of his paying respect to the stories that made him fall in love with the medium. Whether that be through overt genre homages or obscure references stealthily positioned into his dialogue, he wears his influences on his sleeve with pride. In Once Upon a Time In Hollywood, he cranks that dial up to 11, creating a film that not only operates as a swan song to an era gone by but as a vehicle for him to vent his own frustrations while living vicariously through the lead characters. For that, it’s easily one of his most personal films to date.

Brad Pitt (left) as Cliff Booth and Leonardo DiCaprio (right) as Rick Dalton

This notion is no more apparent than in a scene shared between Rick Dalton (Leonardo DiCaprio) and the young Trudi (Julia Butters). The two, seated side by side in between shooting their scenes on the TV show “Lancer,” strike up a conversation about their reading material. Trudi, giving a synopsis of her Walt Disney biography, declares him a genius – the type of guy that’s “one-in-a-million.” Dalton, on the other hand, recounts the story of a middle-aged cowboy that’s lost his touch – one that parallels his own state at that point in the film – and drives himself to tears. It’s an “in your face” analogy of Old Hollywood vs. New Hollywood, but it’s effective at telling it as it is: Hollywood, for better or worse, isn’t the same as it once was, and the younger generations don’t gravitate towards the same types of stories. And the inclusion of Walt Disney wasn’t unintentional either – Tarantino has explicitly expressed disdain against the company, and it’s ironically fitting that Once Upon a Time in Hollywood debuted at the box office the same weekend as the live-action reboot of The Lion King, where it earned the #2 spot against the Disney juggernaut. Tarantino is clearly frustrated by classic film’s waning relevance, but that’s not to say the film carries a resentful tone. What Once Upon a Time in Hollywood is, is unabashed and bittersweet – it longs for the days of old while being fearless in its execution.

Margot Robbie as Sharon Tate

And longing this film is, with extended scenes of characters driving, walking, and simply being, set in the lush but lived-in 1960s Hollywood. On a cursory level, the intent behind such a decision on Tarantino’s part may be to simply show off the beautiful production design (which is genuinely astounding), but it’s also maybe an attempt to grasp onto the last remains of a dying breed of film, and to be in the moment with all its authenticity. The Sharon Tate theater scene is a perfect reflection of this, and also a heartbreaking reminder of fame’s fleeting nature. It’s off-putting to even think a film this mature, grounded, and free-flowing came from Tarantino, but at the same time, it’s a story so inherently intertwined within his own journey as a filmmaker that I can’t imagine anyone else making this. That in itself is a testament to his raw talent and legacy behind the camera.

I could say that while satisfying, the ending felt comparatively abrupt versus the consistently steady pace held by the rest of the film, and that I wish Sharon Tate, though treated with much respect under the circumstances, was more developed. At the end of the day, though, I would rather watch an audacious film over a safer film – flaws and all. Let’s treasure those films while we can.

3.75/5 STARS

UW Film Club Podcast #45 – Once Upon a Time in Hollywood

“Hey! You’re Rick ‘The Podcaster’ Dalton, don’t you forget it.”

Keeping in the summer movie spirit, we’ve decided to cover one of the most anticipated films from one of the most revered, yet controversial, filmmakers – Quentin Tarantino’s Once Upon a Time in Hollywood! His newest film involve the lives of a fading television actor and his stunt double as they navigate 1960s era Hollywood. In this podcast, we talk about this film in the context of Tarantino’s entire career, how it pays homage to Sharon Tate, and we have a couple disagreements over the film’s ending. Is this one of the legendary director’s best works? Find out now on the 45th episode of the UW Film Club Podcast!

On this episode: Cynthia Li and Jim Saunders.

You can find us on Facebook at /UWFilmClub, and on Twitter and Instagram @FilmClubUW. Make sure to rate, comment, and subscribe to our podcast on Apple Podcasts, Soundcloud, Spotify, and Google Play, and tune in every Monday for a new episode of the UW Film Club Podcast!

Review: ‘Hobbs and Shaw’ Is… Exactly What You Expected

Going into watching Hobbs and Shaw, a Fast and Furious spin-off, I didn’t expect much. I was hoping I could be pleasantly surprised and say that despite being a bad movie, at least it’s got dumb, fun action. Sadly, however, when I say that this movie isn’t very good, it’s because it didn’t even succeed at that.

This summer’s newest action flick stars Dwayne Johnson, Jason Statham, Vanessa Kirby and Idris Elba. Dame Helen Mirren also makes in an appearance in what is perhaps the saddest underutilization of an actress in recent memory. Johnson and Statham, as our bickering leads, have a painful lack of chemistry. Most of the movie’s dialogue is their banter, which is clearly intended to be clever and humorous. Unfortunately, almost every joke and quip in the runtime just falls flat on its face.

Idris Elba, another unfortunate misuse, was clearly not given enough to work with. He gives it his all to and tries to deliver his lines with as much potency as he can, but there’s just not much he can do with the material. In fact, I’d say most of the actors here are trying their best to make something out of nothing. Statham and Kirby really seemed to try and sell their characters (Johnson’s effort was there too, but really only as a conciliation prize), but the end of the day, a movie like this can only be held up by its action sequences. Unfortunately, Hobbs and Shaw doesn’t really deliver on this front either.

In a far cry from the street racing roots of Fast and Furious, the action here is all completely outlandish and ridiculous. Now, this isn’t bad in and of itself; when disbelief can be suspended, such scenes can work really well. In fact, one set piece towards the end, which was perhaps the most insane, I found oddly compelling. Perhaps that’s because it was paired with a touchstone to Dwayne Johnson’s Samoan culture, a plot point which was heartwarming, exhilarating, and the highlight of the movie for me. Regrettably, nothing else is as good. Set pieces with drones and jumping off of buildings and a cybernetically-enhanced Idris Elba are just sloppily put together, not very well shot, and come across as nothing more than adequate. To sell this movie for me, the action had to have been heart-pumping back to front; sadly, it wasn’t.

Other aspects of Hobbs and Shaw are exactly what you’ve come to expect from the franchise. The plot, which delivers a weird anti-technology message, is contrived and unfulfilling. The musical choices all sound like mid-2000’s club rap (although some of them were, admittedly, fire). There’s an uncomfortable sexist aura about everything they painfully try to lampshade with lines referencing male chauvinism. It just feels like every aspect of this movie trips over itself. I can see what they were going for here; I can see where they tried to make unique stylistic choices. I wanted to enjoy Hobbs and Shaw, I really did. Unfortunately, it is a better movie to laugh at, than to laugh with.

1.5/5 STARS