UW Film Club Podcast #67 – American Graffiti

“This is the most beautiful, exciting podcast I’ve ever heard in my life and I don’t know anything about it.”

If you’re anything like us, you’re probably still reeling from the monumental 2020 Oscars, where club favorite film Parasite took home 4 awards, including Best Picture (being the first foreign language film to do so). So in honor of Parasite etching its name into the legendary monolith of film history, we’ve decided to cover a film all about paving ones own path and legacy: American Graffiti! On this episode, we talk about the film’s setting/historical context, its themes of nostalgia and moving on from the past, and George Lucas’ storied yet stormy film legacy. Where were you in ’62? If you’re reading this, you likely weren’t alive, but you should still check out the 67th episode of the UW Film Club Podcast now!

On this episode: Jim Saunders and Joey Franklin

You can find us on Facebook at /UWFilmClub, and on Twitter and Instagram @FilmClubUW. Make sure to rate, comment, and subscribe to our podcast on Apple Podcasts, Soundcloud, Spotify, and Google Play, and tune in every Monday for a new episode of the UW Film Club Podcast

UW Film Club Podcast #58 – Scott Pilgrim vs. the World

“We are the UW Film Club Podcast and we are here to make you think about death and get sad and stuff.”

It’s the start of week 9! And in this time of stress as we start to prepare for finals, let’s get nostalgic! We’re taking it back to 2010 with the release of the “epic of epic epicness” – Scott Pilgrim vs. the World! An homage to video game culture while also being a hilarious comedy, Edgar Wright’s directorial vision and ensemble cast elevates this box office flop to true cult classic status. In this podcast, we talk about the strength of the main character’s arc, its effortless usage of visual comedy & storytelling, and what the film is saying about modern relationships. Are you ready to play? Then boot up the 58th episode of the UW Film Club Podcast now!

On this episode: Jim Saunders and Payton Bissell

You can find us on Facebook at /UWFilmClub, and on Twitter and Instagram @FilmClubUW. Make sure to rate, comment, and subscribe to our podcast on Apple Podcasts, Soundcloud, Spotify, and Google Play, and tune in every Monday for a new episode of the UW Film Club Podcast!

UW Film Club Podcast #46 – The Fast and the Furious

“You almost had me?! You never had me – you never even had your podcast!”

We’re a week late (as usual), but in honor of Hobbs and Shaw, we’ve decided to shift gears in reverse back to 2001, and take it back to where the franchise all started, with The Fast and the Furious! In this podcast, we draw comparisons to Kathryn Bigelow’s Point Break, talk about the legacy of the series, and ponder the appeal of Vin Diesel. Come along for the ride on the 46th episode of the UW Film Club Podcast!

On this episode: Cynthia Li and Jim Saunders.

You can find us on Facebook at /UWFilmClub, and on Twitter and Instagram @FilmClubUW. Make sure to rate, comment, and subscribe to our podcast on Apple Podcasts, Soundcloud, Spotify, and Google Play, and tune in every Monday for a new episode of the UW Film Club Podcast!

Review: ‘Us’ Continues Jordan Peele’s Streak as an Audacious Horror Filmmaker

On his twitter account, writer/director Jordan Peele briefly declared, in two separate tweets, that his debut Get Out was a documentary, while his sophomore feature Us was a horror movie. While Get Out obviously isn’t a documentary in the technical sense, its horror-comedy framework is intelligently utilized to highlight the underlying anxiety in a very human narrative; it’s Peele’s authenticity and biting commentary that made it a hit. And by all accounts, Get Out was lightning in a bottle, being a success among general audiences and winning multiple awards including Best Original Screenplay at the 2018 Academy Awards. Peele had already proven himself to be a very capable writer/director on his first outing, so when it comes to Us, comparisons to his prior work will inevitably be made, despite the evident distinction its mastermind has clearly highlighted.

It’s hard not to make those comparisons, especially considering the tremendous strength and cultural impact of Peele’s debut. But Us is a different beast entirely; an unraveling and mysterious work that leaves you asking even more questions at the end than at the beginning. This isn’t to say the film’s plotting is hard to follow or confusing, since it follows a considerably standard narrative structure. Rather, much like some of the all-time great horror films, its true meaning (especially the ending) is considerably elastic. The more you think about and revisit a film like Us, the more you’ll get out of it. Jordan Peele has proven his knack for this sort of thing by crafting “smarter than average” horror flicks that reward upon re-watch. From the Hands Across America to the Jeremiah 11:11 allusions, Peele thoughtfully utilizes reincorporation to enrich the subtext, though not all his heady ambitions pan out perfectly (note: the embarrassingly on-the-nose  “We’re Americans” line from the tethered). Nevertheless, he’s a writer/director with plenty of purpose, passion, and intelligence.

Though it was advertised as primarily a horror film, Us still contains its comedic elements, for better or for worse. It’s an off-putting watch in a packed theater, since (again, not trying to compare to Get Out), the balance of horror and comedy isn’t quite as consistent as it is in Peele’s debut, leading to audience members occasionally laughing at inappropriate times. It’s unsure whether or not that’s a true indication of an inconsistent tone, but the laughs definitely felt more jarring than they did in Get Out. Though, it should be noted that there is a scene involving both ‘Good Vibrations’ by The Beach Boys and ‘F The Police’ by N.W.A. that combines the horror and comedy brilliantly. That, and the revelatory dance scene at the end are definite highlights of the film. Speaking of highlights, you can’t talk about this film without mentioning Lupita Nyong’o’s performance. Particularly in the second half, so much of her character is conveyed with subtlety and minimalist dialogue. Her performance and voice work in bringing her doppelgänger Red to life is bone-chilling, and really help elevate Us, on top of an already stellar supporting cast.

At the end of the day, Us feels like a very solid episode of The Twilight Zone: solid execution with some great ideas and ambitions to keep you intrigued. I suppose, then, that Peele was a great fit for the show’s reboot. Frankly, I can’t think of anyone better fit for the job, and I can’t wait for everything he has in store for the future of horror film-making.

Score: 4/5

Review: ‘Green Book’ is a Road Trip Dramedy With Surface-Level Racial Overtones

Green Book was an interesting theatrical experience, as it was, for all intents and purposes, one of the most enjoyable theater experiences I’ve had this year. I tend to have a soft spot for cheesy feel-good movies, especially around the holiday season. However, that same over-sentimentality is why problems with its underlying narrative begin to arise.

For a film entitled Green Book, the actual ‘green books’ that the film derives its name from (the Jim Crow-era guidebooks for African American travelers) seem, oddly enough, like a bit of an afterthought. They’re only briefly mentioned a handful of times and don’t have a significant impact on the narrative itself. The film seems reluctant to fulfill the role of being a sharp commentary on the racial prejudice of the time and instead relies on director Peter Farrelly’s trademark comedic sensibilities.  Fortunately enough, the comedy isn’t nearly as low-brow as his previous work (Dumb and Dumber, There’s Something About Mary) and is handled with sprinkles of charm and class. Unfortunately, the movie’s dramatic weight is diminished, especially when its racial motifs are handled with such a lack of substance or nuance. Instead of being a biting, potentially refreshing social commentary, it’s overly sugary, a bit dumbed down, and Oscar-baity. It seems like a completely missed opportunity, especially considering films from this year like Sorry to Bother YouBlackkklansmanBlindspotting, and hell, even Marvel’s Black Panther, none of which held back in making bold, interesting narrative choices in regards to racially charged overtones.

Green Book, on the other hand, plays it completely safe, opting to be as crowd-pleasing and enjoyable as this story can be (and reaping as much awards attention as possible, go figure). While there’s nothing inherently wrong with a crowd-pleasing film of this caliber, I can’t help but wonder why the film that feels so formulaic in comparison to its contemporaries seems to be one of the strongest contenders for Best Picture at the 2019 Oscars.

That being said, this film definitely isn’t without merit and is indisputably entertaining in its own right. What it may lack as a drama, it more than makes up for as a comedy, and much of its comedy stems from the infectious chemistry between the two leads: Viggo Mortensen as Tony Vallelonga (dubbed Tony Lip), and Mahershala Ali as Dr. Don Shirley. Based on a true story and a “true friendship,” Lip is an Italian-American bouncer-turned-driver for Shirley, an African-American jazz pianist about to embark on a concert tour in the deep South in 1962. The two are almost complete opposites in terms of personality and mannerisms: Shirley is intellectual, well-spoken, and proper, while Lip is anything but. It seems like pure formula, almost akin to an inverse Driving Miss Daisy (another awards show darling back in 1989) but Mortensen and Ali’s performances drive the film and are undeniably the best aspects of it; both are unequivocally excellent in their respective roles and breathe life into the film at every moment, despite the conventional tropes, cliches, and inconsistencies that hold the narrative back from being something truly special and groundbreaking.

Lip undergoes a sort of arc in the film, which, though earnest and obviously well-intended, is presented as uneven at best. At the beginning of the film, he’s shown throwing away water glasses used by two African American maintenance workers that came into his house, but from that point on, Lip is never shown as being nearly as despicably racist, unless convenient to the plot to create tension between him and Shirley. Nevertheless, the duo is an absolute blast to watch on screen and makes the perpetual cheesiness substantially more tolerable. Ali brings a level of elegance and class, yet also of immense vulnerability, to his performance, making Dr. Don Shirley an incredibly likable figure. You might even find yourself choking up a little near the film’s climax and resolution, where the movie’s themes, though shallow and sanitary considering its subject matter, are tied up neatly and in a perfectly satisfactory manner. Green Book is an exemplary feel-good movie, and though it’s over-sentimentality causing it to shy away from any real racial commentary is a missed opportunity, it’s sure to be a hit at both the box office this holiday season, as well as the Oscars next year.

Score: 3.5/5

Review: Low Brow Entertainment in Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom

We are well deep into the franchise wars. Of all the major studios, Universal seems to be the only one that can produce a billion dollar film that can match Disney. Though their success is limited to three franchises: the Fast and the Furious, Despicable Me, and Jurassic Park. With the collapse of their ‘Dark Universe’ and the high likelihood that they get bid out by Disney for FOX, the studio is banking on Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom more than ever. When director J.A. Bayona stepped in, there was a shimmer of hope for the project, but unfortunately, it fits right in with all the other amateurish blockbusters we see all too often.

Set after the events of the first Jurassic World, Fallen Kingdom sees society deciding what to do with the remaining dinosaurs on Isla Nublar. When the government ultimately decides to let nature take its course with a volcanic eruption, a private company decides to take action and save the dinosaurs themselves. They enlist the help of Owen Grady (Chris Pratt) and Claire Dearing (Bryce Dallas Howard) to gain access to the island and track the illusive raptor, Blue. However, once on the island, all hell breaks loose as the eruption starts, and they soon realize that extinction might be the least of their concerns. 

There is nothing particularly wrong with the direction or pacing of the film, but the script is quite baffling. Derek Connolly and Colin Trevorrow (yes, the same man who wrote The Book of Henry, got removed from Star Wars 9 because of it, and is now slated to direct Jurassic World 3 — I WANT TO DIE) wrote this script and produced nothing short of a head scratcher. The first half is an action adventure film where Owen, Claire, and the cohort of paramilitary troops try to prevent dinosaur extinction, and the second half is a horror action film that relegates itself to a mansion in Northern California. One we are familiar with, and the other is reminiscent of The Lost World’s San Diego set piece, though this time it is more limited and narrowly located. 

While the film feels pretty evenly split, the first half is a head above the second, which seemingly saved most of its eyebrow-raising moments for the end. Revelations in particular draw the most ire as require a certain amount of suspended disbelief in order to settle with audiences, and the nature of the second half calls into question, “What connotes a Jurassic Park film?” To question the franchise itself isn’t inherently a bad change, but it can be hard to grapple with, and I’m not sure I one hundred percent agree with the take or direction.

Then there are the political undertones which are under baked and serve as a means of justifying film’s events. Near the start, politicians debate whether to take action and save the dinosaurs, but decide not to, causing a private company to take action. Making overt allusions to political inaction, this scene acts as a catalyst for character motivation, but it barely rears its thematic head during the film’s length and only pops back up in a closing monolog. If the first Jurassic Park is about man’s ignorance, The Lost World about domestication, and Jurassic World about unchecked corporations, then this film aims to be about the negative effects of political indolence, but again, you wouldn’t know until the film bookended itself with Jeff Goldblum monologues.

This doesn’t seem to be any fault of J.A. Bayona, but rather a sourced problem of the industrialized script. The film’s ending acts on this underdeveloped notion of political inaction, but the result is quite underwhelming and it really makes you question the industry’s incessant need for sequels. You can only go back to Jurassic Park so many times before you tread the same ideas, so it makes sense to end the film in this way so you can evolve the franchise, but you can’t help but feel cheated on the premise they are selling you, as if the actions by characters can’t justify the the political and thematic undertones they are trying to convey.

Then again, this is dinosaur movie, and while I felt wronged by the film’s script, seeing dinosaurs duke it out made for some low brow entertainment, if only passively. The long promised extinction that has populated the film’s marketing is every bit as grand as you would expect, and the second half with the ‘Indoraptor’ is kinda cool, I guess, but you have to look past the script to find any enjoyment. There is undoubtably some submissive value to it, but beyond that, you’ll be hard pressed to find anything worth a second viewing. 

Score: 2.25/5 Stars