Purpose
To define the parameters for acceptable use of Complete Freund’s Adjuvant and alternative adjuvants in research animals at the University of Washington.
Definitions
- Adjuvant:
- A substance that enhances the body’s immune response to an antigen
Background
Reliance has traditionally been placed on the use of CFA as an adjuvant, or antibody production enhancer, for producing polyclonal antibodies in animals, but recently many effective alternatives have been made commercially available. Inflammation results from the use of adjuvants and reactions vary according to the anatomical site in which it is placed, the volume of antigen used, and the purity of the antigen. Severe reactions to CFA have been documented in both mice and rabbits, although such reactions can be minimized through decreasing the volume of adjuvant injected or through use of alternative adjuvants. Discontinuance of the use of CFA has been advocated and use of alternative adjuvants is strongly encouraged (see resources to identify alternatives below).
Policy
Use of CFA is permitted if the investigator provides scientific justification for its use, in particular that antibody production cannot be achieved through use of less irritating adjuvants.
Alternative adjuvants may include aluminum compounds (e.g., Alum), squalene-in-water emulsions (MF59 and AS03), monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL), Ribi adjuvants, combined with alum (AS04); adjuvants in pre-clinical development (e.g., Montanides), polymeric microparticles, saponins (e.g., Quil A QS-21, ISCOMS, ISCOMATRIX), immunostimulatory nucleic acids (e.g. CpG oligodeoxynucleotides, poly IC:LC); other toll-like receptor-agonists (e.g., flagellin, imidazoquinolines, small molecules), cationic liposome formulations (CAF) combined with immunestimulators such as trehalose dibehenate (TDB) virus-like particles, nanoparticles, 19-21 and oligonucleotide complexes; other procedures or emulsions such as subcutaneously-implanted chambers, TiterMax, EMULSIGENS, Syntex Adjuvant Formulation (SAF), and Specol.
Regardless of the adjuvant used, precautions must be used, including aseptic preparation of the injection site and sterility of the inocula to be used in animals.
With regards to alternative adjuvants, subcutaneous (SC) or intraperitoneal (IP) administration is preferred in rodents and other routes, such as intradermal administration, are discouraged and must be scientifically justified by the investigator because of local lesions that can result. Injection volume should not be more than 0.25 ml per SC site for rabbits, and 0.1 ml SC or 0.2 ml IP for mice and rats.
Approval to perform CFA injections may be granted by the IACUC if investigators are able to demonstrate that the use of preferred alternatives is unsatisfactory and there is compelling scientific justification to deviate from the recommendations made above. Records of adjuvant administration including injection volume, location, and administration date must be maintained.
With regards to the use of CFA, SC administration is the preferred route in rodents. A concentration of <0.1 mg/ml is generally recommended to decrease potential side effects. Intradermal injections and use of the foot pad as an injection site requires justification. IP injection of CFA in mice and rats, which has been documented to cause severe peritonitis, is not acceptable. Table 1 lists maximum volume per site and route of administration.
CFA should be used in only the first injection; subsequent injections requiring an adjuvant must use Freund’s incomplete or another appropriate adjuvant with a minimum of two weeks between subsequent inoculations.
Volume, route, and site of adjuvant injection should adhere to the Guidelines for Use of Adjuvants in Research published by the Animal Research Advisory Committee of the National Institutes of Health (see table below from this publication).
Table 1: Maximum Volume of Complete Freund’s Adjuvant-Antigen Emulsion (CFA-AE) per site and route of administration
Species | SC(mL) | Intradermal(mL) | Footpad (mL) |
Mouse | 0.1 | 0.05** | 0.05** |
Rat | 0.1 | 0.05** | 0.1** |
Rabbit | 0.25 | 0.05** | * |
Non-human Primates** | Freund’s Adjuvant is not generally recommended for use in non-human primates, as it may interfere with TB testing results and cause excessive inflammation. Nevertheless, it is recognized that some models may require the use of CFA. If used, the maximum volumes should not exceed those used in rabbits and should be scientifically justified. |
*not recommended
** only when justified
References
- ARAC. Guidelines for the Use of Adjuvants in Research: Special Emphasis on Freund’s Adjuvant.. NIH Intramural Guidelines. 2019.
- Sayer, S., et al. “Vaxjo: A Web-based Vaccine Adjuvant Database and Its Application for Analysis of Vaccine Adjuvants and Their Uses in Vaccine Development.” J Biomed Biotechnol, 2012. Vaxjo
Approval/Review Dates
Originally Approved: 10/16/2014
Last Reviewed/Revised by the IACUC: 12/16/2021