Resident & Fellow Evaluation
Table of Contents
Definitions
Feedback is ongoing information provided regarding aspects of one’s performance, knowledge, or understanding. The faculty empower residents to provide much of that feedback themselves in a spirit of continuous learning and self-reflection. Feedback from faculty members in the context of routine clinical care should be frequent, and need not always be formally documented [CPR. V.A.1.]
Formative and summative evaluation have distinct definitions.
Formative evaluation is monitoring resident learning and providing ongoing feedback that can be used by residents to improve their learning in the context of the provision of patient care or other educational opportunities. More specifically, formative evaluations help:
- residents identify their strengths and weaknesses and target areas that need work
- program directors and faculty members recognize where residents are struggling and address problems immediately
Summative evaluation is evaluating a resident’s learning by comparing the residents against the goals and objectives of the rotation and program, respectively. Summative evaluation is utilized to make decisions about promotion to the next level of training, or program completion.
End-of-rotation and end-of-year evaluations have both summative and formative components. Information from a summative evaluation can be used formatively when residents or faculty members use it to guide their efforts and activities in subsequent rotations and to successfully complete the residency program.
Feedback, formative evaluation, and summative evaluation compare intentions with accomplishments, enabling the transformation of a neophyte physician to one with growing expertise.
Milestones
ACGME Resources
- Milestones by Specialty
- List of Specialties with Milestones 2.0
- ACGME Milestones Guidebooks
- ACGME Milestones Resources
- Program Specific Supplemental Guides and webcasts (for select programs) are available (select your Specialty, then select the Milestones tab)
- Webcasts review the major differences between the original Milestones 1.0 and the revised Milestones 2.0, and cover detailed information regarding construction and content changes. Release of webcasts for additional specialties or subspecialties are announced in the weekly ACMGE e-Communication.
Mapping and Revising Curriculum and Assessment Systems
- Beyond Competencies and Milestones: Adding Meaning through Context (JGME)
- Linking Workplace-Based Assessment to ACGME Milestones: A Comparison of Mapping Strategies in Two Specialties (Teaching and Learning in Medicine)
- Implementation of EPA into a General Surgery Residency (Journal of Surgical Education)
- Shortening the Miles to the Milestones: Connecting EPA-Based Evaluations to ACGME Milestones Reports for Internal Medicine Residency Programs (Academic Medicine)
- Entrustable Professional Activities for Gastroenterology Fellowship Training (Gastroenterology)
Presentations
Video by Laura Edgar, EdD, CAE
Vice President, Milestones Development, ACGME
Presented at the April 2022 PDDS
Video by Incho Lee, PhD
Former Director of Educational Quality Improvement, GME
Video by Alyson Reighley
Residency Management System Administrator, GME
MedHub – Overview of Milestones 2.0
Video by Alyson Reighley
Residency Management System Administrator, GME
Video by John Choe, MD, MPH
Associate Program Director, Internal Medicine Residency Program
Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs)
- Nuts and Bolts of EPAs. Olle ten Cate. JGME (2013)
- Five Stage Approach for Developing Specialty-specific EPAs. Kwan et al. BMC Medcial Education (2016).
EPA Worksheets:
Feedback
- Feedback, Evaluation, and Program Improvement Inventories (UW GME)
- “Prepare to ADAPT” Feedback Framework for learners and coaches (UW GME)
- Oral questioning method: SNAPPS
- What’s In Your Influence Toolkit & Influencing Your Subordinates: Giving Great Feedback (Christina Fong 4/26/2018 PDDS)
- Do’s, don’ts, and don’t knows of feedback. (Lefroy et al. Perspect Med Educ, 2015)
- Do’s, don’ts, and don’t knows of direct observation. (Kogan et al. Perspect Med Educ, 2017)
- How to give difficult feedback (Eileen Klein, UW CLIME, Podcast)
- Feedback Presentation + Group Discussion & Exercises (Monica Van de Ridder, 10/10/17 PDDS)
Giving feedback | Constructive Feedback in Medical Education |
Video by: University of Alabama at Birmingham | Video by: INMED Institute for International Medicine |
Goals and Expectations of Ward Service Rotation | Mid-Rotation Formative Feedback on Ward Service |
Videos by: Marshfield Clinic |
Individualized Learning Plan (ILP)
An individualized learning plan (ILP) is documented personal roadmap for learning developed by a resident with the help of a program director, mentor, faculty member, or facilitator. It is a tool designed to help create self-directed learning skills for residents, which also support lifelong learning.
ILP is not set in stone. Generally speaking, ILP consists of long-term and short-term goals, specific objectives, career choice, self-identified strengths and weaknesses, development of strategies to achieve the goal and objectives, assessment of progress on goal and objectives, feedback from faculty/mentor/advisor, and a new goal. [Note that the terms “goal” and “objective” are sometimes used interchangeably while other times they are not. In this document, the term “goal” is defined as a broad, intangible, and an abstract description of a destination (where residents want to go) while objective explains specifically how residents get there.]
Research often finds that generating specific, measurable, and achievable objectives is a challenge for residents. Many residents call for training about developing objectives. Remember that if a resident has objectives that can be hard to achieve, a mentor/faculty should raise concern, let the resident think about it, and guide the resident toward developing specific and reasonable objectives. A mentor/faculty’s role is not to tell them to change ILP, but guide them to revise it.
- Individualized learning plans: Basics and beyond
- I-SMART strategies for goal generation and plan development
- Is residents’ progress on individualized learning plans related to the type of learning goal set?
- Are residents ready for self-directed learning? A pilot program of individualized learning plans in continuity clinic
ACGME Common Program Requirements
The program director or their designee, with input from the Clinical Competency Committee, must (1) assist residents in developing individualized learning plans to capitalize on their strengths and identify areas for growth [CPR V.A. 1.d).(2)]; and develop plans for residents failing to progress, following institutional policies and procedures [CPR V.A.1.d).(3)].
Assessment and Evaluation Samples and Tools
Review the following tools and samples, which are provided to illustrate how some GME programs have approached assessment and evaluation. The assessment samples are categorized as formative, occurring during the learning process, or summative, at the end of training.
Formative Assessment
- Direct Observation
- End-of-Rotation Samples
- 360 Degree (Multi-Source Assessment)
- Tools
- Samples
- Semi-Annual Samples
Resources
- UW GME Resident/Fellow Evaluation Guidelines
- Eval-Palooza: Optimizing Your Evaluation System for Effective Outcomes (recording from 5/28/2024 UW GME Feedback Series)
- UW CLIME
- Faculty Development
- JGME
- Academic Medicine
- JAMA
Full access available to journals through the UW Library
GME Office
Phone: 206.543.6806
Email: uwgme@uw.edu