Faculty Evaluation

An annual evaluation of faculty members is an ACGME Common Program Requirement:

• V.B. Faculty Evaluation
  • V.B.1. The program must have a process to evaluate each faculty member’s performance as it relates to the educational program at least annually.
    • V.B.1.a) This evaluation must include a review of the faculty member’s clinical teaching abilities, engagement with the educational program, participation in faculty development related to their skills as an educator, clinical performance, professionalism, and scholarly activities.
    • V.B.1.b) This evaluation must include written, anonymous, and confidential evaluations by the residents.
  • V.B.2. Faculty members must receive feedback on their evaluations at least annually.
  • V.B.3. Results of the faculty educational evaluations should be incorporated into program-wide faculty development plans.

To help programs meet this requirement, GME has compiled the resources below.

• Eval-Palooza: Optimizing Your Evaluation System for Effective Outcomes (recording from 5/28/2024 UW GME Feedback Series)
• Remediation of the Struggling Clinical Educator (JGME)
• Global Measure of Faculty’s Clinical Teaching Performance (GRS), (Academic Medicine)
• Validation of the 25-Item Stanford Faculty Development Program Tool on Clinical Teaching Effectiveness (Teaching and Learning in Medicine)
• Systematic Evaluation of Teaching Qualities of Medical Faculty (SETQ), (PLosOne)
• Physician Clinical Performance Assessment: Prospect and Barriers (JAMA)
• New Tools for Systematic Evaluation of Teaching Qualities of Medical Faculty: Results of an Ongoing Multi-Center Survey (PLosOne)
• Examination of a Clinical Teaching Effectiveness Instrument Used for Summative Faculty Assessment (Evaluation and the Health Professions)